Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-16 Thread Lincoln Yeoh

At 04:46 AM 4/16/2008, Colin Wetherbee wrote:

Tom Lane wrote:

Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to 
happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".
Well, it's more of a historical hangover.  Personally I'd not have 
much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.


I'm not generally in the habit of making typos, so this doesn't 
affect me too much.


However, IMHO and as I mentioned previously, I don't think 
"\timimng" should succeed.  I'll leave the rest of the discussion up 
to you and the other developers, though. :)


I too agree that \timimng should not work.

Maybe someone can think of an undesirable surprise that springs from 
this "feature" ;).


\i
\e

Are possible candidates (probably others could clobber files given a typo).

I think requiring a space between command and arguments would be a 
good idea. And not doing stuff if there are syntax errors...


Link.



--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-15 Thread Colin Wetherbee

Tom Lane wrote:

Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to 
happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".


Well, it's more of a historical hangover.  Personally I'd not have 
much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.


I'm not generally in the habit of making typos, so this doesn't affect 
me too much.


However, IMHO and as I mentioned previously, I don't think "\timimng" 
should succeed.  I'll leave the rest of the discussion up to you and 
the other developers, though. :)


Colin

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to 
> happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".

Well, it's more of a historical hangover.  Personally I'd not have
much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-15 Thread Colin Wetherbee

Tom Lane wrote:

Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

I just made a typo in psql, and it resulted in something I
wouldn't have expected.



js=# \timimng Showing only tuples.


This is related to the discussion about whether to require a space 
between a backslash command name and its arguments ...


I see.

So, this was interpreted by psql in the same way "\t imimng" would 
have been?  Not that \t does anything with arguments, though...


I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to 
happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".


Colin


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-15 Thread Tom Lane
Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just made a typo in psql, and it resulted in something I wouldn't have 
> expected.

> js=# \timimng
> Showing only tuples.

This is related to the discussion about whether to require a space
between a backslash command name and its arguments ...

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


Re: [GENERAL] Suggestion for psql command interpretation

2008-04-15 Thread Colin Wetherbee

Colin Wetherbee wrote:
I just made a typo in psql, and it resulted in something I wouldn't have 
expected.


Oh, um, this was in the 8.3.1 psql.

Colin


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general