Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:21 PM, SunWuKung ralik...@hotmail.com wrote: Yep, it is probably a bug though. It's not...it's just the way plpgsql works. I prefix all my local variables in plpgsql with an underscore to prevent these kinds of conflicts. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
Dunno, if it was a documented behavior it should fail both on on 8.1 Linux and on 8.4 Windows, but it only fails on 8.4 Windows. I will try to create a clear test. Merlin Moncure-2 wrote: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 6:21 PM, SunWuKung ralik...@hotmail.com wrote: Yep, it is probably a bug though. It's not...it's just the way plpgsql works. I prefix all my local variables in plpgsql with an underscore to prevent these kinds of conflicts. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25857385.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:20:32 pm SunWuKung wrote: Hi, I have a plpgsql function called irq(IN ulist integer[], .) It works fine on 8.1 Linux On 8.4 on windows XP running the function gives an error message (Undefined column: 7 ERROR: record rec has no field instreq_id) wich is strange because the underlying query does return that column. I run the create script of irq to create irq2 - and irq2 works fine. I delete irq and rename irq2 to irq and I get the error back. The error is consistent in the sense that if I delete the database and restore it it appears again the same way. Is this a bug? Any suggestion what I should be doing with this? Thanks for the help. SWK -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847709.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Are you using the string 'irq' inside the function? -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
Yes, I use it as a table alias inside the function. Select .. irq.instreq_min_metcount, irq.ref_deptype, irq.instreq_aggrfunc From .. instrument_requirement irq ON Adrian Klaver wrote: On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:20:32 pm SunWuKung wrote: Hi, I have a plpgsql function called irq(IN ulist integer[], .) It works fine on 8.1 Linux On 8.4 on windows XP running the function gives an error message (Undefined column: 7 ERROR: record rec has no field instreq_id) wich is strange because the underlying query does return that column. I run the create script of irq to create irq2 - and irq2 works fine. I delete irq and rename irq2 to irq and I get the error back. The error is consistent in the sense that if I delete the database and restore it it appears again the same way. Is this a bug? Any suggestion what I should be doing with this? Thanks for the help. SWK -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847709.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Are you using the string 'irq' inside the function? -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847881.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
Right, I replace the table alias irq to instreq and the function works. I don't know what could have been the problem: is irq a reserved word, or it's because the table alias has the same name then the function name. Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. SWK SunWuKung wrote: Yes, I use it as a table alias inside the function. Select .. irq.instreq_min_metcount, irq.ref_deptype, irq.instreq_aggrfunc From .. instrument_requirement irq ON Adrian Klaver wrote: On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:20:32 pm SunWuKung wrote: Hi, I have a plpgsql function called irq(IN ulist integer[], .) It works fine on 8.1 Linux On 8.4 on windows XP running the function gives an error message (Undefined column: 7 ERROR: record rec has no field instreq_id) wich is strange because the underlying query does return that column. I run the create script of irq to create irq2 - and irq2 works fine. I delete irq and rename irq2 to irq and I get the error back. The error is consistent in the sense that if I delete the database and restore it it appears again the same way. Is this a bug? Any suggestion what I should be doing with this? Thanks for the help. SWK -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847709.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Are you using the string 'irq' inside the function? -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25847955.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:48:02 pm SunWuKung wrote: Right, I replace the table alias irq to instreq and the function works. I don't know what could have been the problem: is irq a reserved word, or it's because the table alias has the same name then the function name. Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. SWK It is not a reserved word (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-keywords-appendix.html). My guess is it was the name conflict between the function name and the table alias. -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
Re: [GENERAL] strange plpgsql error
Yep, it is probably a bug though. Adrian Klaver wrote: On Sunday 11 October 2009 2:48:02 pm SunWuKung wrote: Right, I replace the table alias irq to instreq and the function works. I don't know what could have been the problem: is irq a reserved word, or it's because the table alias has the same name then the function name. Thanks for pointing me to the right direction. SWK It is not a reserved word (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/sql-keywords-appendix.html). My guess is it was the name conflict between the function name and the table alias. -- Adrian Klaver akla...@comcast.net -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/strange-plpgsql-error-tp25847709p25848214.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
