Greetings, Peter!
At 29.08.2001, 23:32, you wrote:
>> But I do think that
>> the statements in
>> http://www.mysql.com/doc/M/y/MySQL-PostgreSQL_features.html
>> should NOT go unanswered.
PE> Okay, I answered them:
PE> http://webmail.postgresql.org/~petere/comparison.html
Looks good, but it's not exactly what I've had in mind. You see it
is too often considered that if someone has to justify oneself, he
is automatically guilty. I want to write an article that would
make MySQL's developers justify themselves...
Besides, one has to read the MySQL's article *before* this just to
understand what's this all about...
BTW, can I use parts of your answers in my work?
And, a question to SQL standard gurus: is it necessary for a DBMS
to implement subqueries and views to be considered entry-level
SQL92 compliant.
Besides, is there any document which has all PostgreSQL's
deviations from standard in one place?
PE> I tried to be reasonable and biased at the same time. ;-)
PE> This article does not go into the advantages of PostgreSQL, since that's
PE> already done elsewhere, such as here:
PE> http://www.ca.postgresql.org/features.html
--
Yours, Alexey V. Borzov, Webmaster of RDW.ru
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
