Thank you Michael. I agree with you. Relevant part can be removed from the
document and eliminate the confusion at least.
Michael Paquier , 5 Oca 2021 Sal, 10:17 tarihinde şunu
yazdı:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 04:12:34PM +0300, Amine Tengilimoglu wrote:
> >When I read the pg_rewind PG12 doc. It says:
> >
> > "... but if the target cluster ran for a long time after the divergence,
> > the old WAL files might no longer be present. In that case, they can be
> > manually copied from the WAL archive to the pg_wal directory,* or fetched
> > on startup by configuring **primary_conninfo
> > <
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/runtime-config-replication.html#GUC-PRIMARY-CONNINFO
> >
> > or restore_command
> > <
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-RESTORE-COMMAND
> >*
> > .".
> >
> > So I thought we could use restore_command. But when I try to use it , I
> > see it doesn't work either.
>
> I agree with your point that the docs of 9.6~12 are confusing here.
> It makes no sense to mention restore_command or primary_conninfo to
> fetch WAL segments for the target to allow pg_rewind to find the point
> of divergence because the target is already offline when we look at
> that. Mentioning restore_command/primary_conninfo for recovery
> purposes could make sense in the context in the follow-up paragraph
> though, where the target gets restarted, after the rewind. But the
> uses are different.
>
> The docs of 13~ got that right when -c has been introduced by
> rewording this sentence as "or run pg_rewind with the -c option to
> automatically retrieve them from the WAL archive". So let's get rid
> of ", or fetched on startup by configuring primary_conninfo or
> restore_command." ("or fetched on startup by configuring
> recovery.conf" in some older branches). This confusion has been
> introduced by 878bd9a, down to 9.6.
>
> Heikki, what do you think?
> --
> Michael
>
