Re: Logical replication failure modes
I should have added that the source DB is 16.1 and the target is 16.0
Logical replication failure modes
I am trying to discover the causes of occasional data loss in logical replication; it is VERY rare and happens every few week/months. Our setup is a source DB running in docker on AWS cloud server. The source database is stored in on local disks on the cloud server. The replication target is a K8 POD running in an AWS instance with an attached persistent AWS disk. The disk mounting is managed by K8. Periodically this POD is deleted and restarted in an orderly way, and the persistent disk stores the database. What we are seeing is *very* occasional records not being replicated in the more active tables. Sometimes we have a backlog of several GB of data due to missing fields in the target or network outages etc. I am also seeing signs that some triggers are not being applied (at the same time frame): ie. data *is* inserted but triggers that summarize that data is not summarizing some rows and the dates on those non-summarized rows corresponds to dates on unrelated missing rows in other tables. This all leads me to conclude that there might be missing transactions? Or non-applied transactions etc. But it is further complicated by the fact that there is a second target database that *does* have all the missing records. Any insights or avenues of exploration would be very welcome!
RE: pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16?
...patch actually attached this time... > > I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for > > a subscription. > > > > Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if > > anyone else is working on it. > > Yes, it certainly should. That is an omission in 482675987b. > Go ahead and write a fix! Please find attached a patch for pg_dump to honour the setting of `run_as_owner`; I believe that effective pre-16 behavious was to run as owner, so I have set the flag to ‘t’ for pre-16 versions. Please let me know if you would prefer the opposite. > > Further to this: it seems that `Alter Subscription X > > Set(Run_As_Owner=True);` > > has no influence on the `subrunasowner` column of pg_subscriptions. > > This seems to have been fixed in f062cddafe. Yes, I can confirm that in the current head `pg_subscriptions` reflects the setting correctly. pg_dump-run_as_owner.patch Description: Binary data
RE: pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16?
> > I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for > > a subscription. > > > > Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if > > anyone else is working on it. > > Yes, it certainly should. That is an omission in 482675987b. > Go ahead and write a fix! Please find attached a patch for pg_dump to honour the setting of `run_as_owner`; I believe that effective pre-16 behavious was to run as owner, so I have set the flag to ‘t’ for pre-16 versions. Please let me know if you would prefer the opposite. > > Further to this: it seems that `Alter Subscription X > > Set(Run_As_Owner=True);` > > has no influence on the `subrunasowner` column of pg_subscriptions. > > This seems to have been fixed in f062cddafe. Yes, I can confirm that in the current head `pg_subscriptions` reflects the setting correctly.
RE: pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16?
Further to this: it seems that `Alter Subscription X Set(Run_As_Owner=True);` has no influence on the `subrunasowner` column of pg_subscriptions. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Philip Warner Sent: Friday, 27 October 2023 3:26 PM To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org Subject: pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16? Hi, I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for a subscription. Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if anyone else is working on it. Sent from Mail for Windows
pg_dump not dumping the run_as_owner setting from version 16?
Hi, I as far as I can tell, pg_dump does not dup the ‘run_as_owner` setting for a subscription. Should it? Should I submit a patch? It seems pretty trivial to fix if anyone else is working on it. Sent from Mail for Windows