Fix comments of heap_prune_chain()
Hi,While I’m reading source codes related to vacuum, I found comments whichdon’t seem to fit the reality. I think the commit[1] just forgot to fix them.What do you think?[1] https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=dc7420c2c9274a283779ec19718d2d16323640c0 Regards,-- Masahiro IkedaNTT DATA CORPORATION v1-0001-fix_heap_prune_chain.patch Description: Binary data
Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view
On 2021/03/22 16:50, Fujii Masao wrote: > > > On 2021/03/22 9:50, ikedamsh wrote: >> Agreed. I separated the patches. >> >> If only the former is committed, my trivial concern is that there may be >> a disadvantage, but no advantage for the standby server. It may lead to >> performance degradation to the wal receiver by calling >> INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(), but the stats can't visible for users until the >> latter patch is committed. > > Your concern is valid, so let's polish and commit also the 0003 patch to v14. > I'm still thinking that it's better to separate wal_xxx columns into > walreceiver's and the others. But if we count even walreceiver activity on > the existing columns, regarding 0003 patch, we need to update the document? > For example, "Number of times WAL buffers were written out to disk via > XLogWrite request." should be "Number of times WAL buffers were written > out to disk via XLogWrite request and by WAL receiver process."? Maybe > we need to append some descriptions about this into "WAL configuration" > section? Agreed. Users can know whether the stats is for walreceiver or not. The pg_stat_wal view in standby server shows for the walreceiver, and in primary server it shows for the others. So, I updated the document. (v20-0003-Makes-the-wal-receiver-report-WAL-statistics.patch) >> I followed the argument of pg_pwrite(). >> But, I think "char *" is better, so fixed it. > > Thanks for updating the patch! > > +extern int XLogWriteFile(int fd, char *buf, > + size_t nbyte, off_t offset, > + TimeLineID timelineid, XLogSegNo segno, > + bool write_all); > > write_all seems not to be necessary. You added this flag for walreceiver, > I guess. But even without the argument, walreceiver seems to work expectedly. > So, what about the attached patch? I applied some cosmetic changes to the > patch. Thanks a lot. Yes, "write_all" is unnecessary. Your patch is looks good to me. Regards, -- Masahiro Ikeda NTT DATA CORPORATION diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml index db4b4e460c..281b13b9fa 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/monitoring.sgml @@ -3493,7 +3493,8 @@ SELECT pid, wait_event_type, wait_event FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE wait_event i Number of times WAL buffers were written out to disk via - XLogWrite request. + XLogWrite request and WAL data were written + out to disk by the WAL receiver process. See for more information about the internal WAL function XLogWrite. @@ -3521,7 +3522,8 @@ SELECT pid, wait_event_type, wait_event FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE wait_event i Total amount of time spent writing WAL buffers to disk via - XLogWrite request, in milliseconds + XLogWrite request and WAL data to disk + by the WAL receiver process, in milliseconds (if is enabled, otherwise zero). This includes the sync time when wal_sync_method is either diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml index ae4a3c1293..39e7028c96 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/wal.sgml @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ - There are two internal functions to write WAL data to disk: + There are two internal functions to write generated WAL data to disk: XLogWrite and issue_xlog_fsync. When is enabled, the total amounts of time XLogWrite writes and @@ -795,7 +795,19 @@ issue_xlog_fsync syncs WAL data to disk are also counted as wal_write and wal_sync in pg_stat_wal, respectively. - + To write replicated WAL data to disk by the WAL receiver is almost the same + as above except for some points. First, there is a dedicated code path for the + WAL receiver to write data although issue_xlog_fsync is + the same for syncing data. + Second, the WAL receiver writes replicated WAL data per bytes from the local + memory although the generated WAL data is written per WAL buffer pages. + The counters of wal_write, wal_sync, + wal_write_time, and wal_sync_time are + common statistics for writing/syncing both generated and replicated WAL data. + But, you can distinguish them because the generated WAL data is written/synced + in the primary server and the replicated WAL data is written/synced in + the standby server. + diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a7a94d2a83..df028c5039 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -771,6 +771,9 @@ WalRcvDie(int code, Datum arg) /* Ensure that all WAL records received are flushed to disk */ XLogWalRcvFlush(true); + /* Send WAL statisti
Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view
On 2021-03-19 16:30, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2021/03/15 10:39, Masahiro Ikeda wrote:
>> Thanks, I understood get_sync_bit() checks the sync flags and
>> the write unit of generated wal data and replicated wal data is
>> different.
>> (It's interesting optimization whether to use kernel cache or not.)
>>
>> OK. Although I agree to separate the stats for the walrecever,
>> I want to hear opinions from other people too. I didn't change the
>> patch.
>>
>> Please feel to your comments.
>
> What about applying the patch for common WAL write function like
> XLogWriteFile(), separately from the patch for walreceiver's stats?
> Seems the former reaches the consensus, so we can commit it firstly.
> Also even only the former change is useful because which allows
> walreceiver to report WALWrite wait event.
Agreed. I separated the patches.
If only the former is committed, my trivial concern is that there may be
a disadvantage, but no advantage for the standby server. It may lead to
performance degradation to the wal receiver by calling
INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(), but the stats can't visible for users until the
latter patch is committed.
I think it's ok because this not happening in the case to disable the
"track_wal_io_timing" in the standby server. Although some users may start the
standby server using the backup which "track_wal_io_timing" is enabled in the
primary server, they will say it's ok since the users already accept the
performance degradation in the primary server.
>> OK. I agree.
>>
>> I wonder to change the error check ways depending on who calls this
>> function?
>> Now, only the walreceiver checks (1)errno==0 and doesn't check
>> (2)errno==ENITR.
>> Other processes are the opposite.
>>
>> IIUC, it's appropriate that every process checks (1)(2).
>> Please let me know my understanding is wrong.
>
> I'm thinking the same. Regarding (2), commit 79ce29c734 introduced
> that code. According to the following commit log, it seems harmless
> to retry on EINTR even walreceiver.
>
> Also retry on EINTR. All signals used in the backend are flagged
> SA_RESTART
> nowadays, so it shouldn't happen, but better to be defensive.
Thanks, I understood.
>>> BTW, currently XLogWrite() increments IO timing even when pg_pwrite()
>>> reports an error. But this is useless. Probably IO timing should be
>>> incremented after the return code of pg_pwrite() is checked, instead?
>>
>> Yes, I agree. I fixed it.
>> (v18-0003-Makes-the-wal-receiver-report-WAL-statistics.patch)
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> nleft = nbytes;
> do
> {
> - errno = 0;
> + written = XLogWriteFile(openLogFile, from,
> nleft, (off_t)
> startoffset,
> +
> ThisTimeLineID, openLogSegNo, wal_segment_size);
>
> Can we merge this do-while loop in XLogWrite() into the loop
> in XLogWriteFile()?
> If we do that, ISTM that the following codes are not necessary in
> XLogWrite().
>
> nleft -= written;
> from += written;
OK, I fixed it.
> + * 'segsize' is a segment size of WAL segment file.
>
> Since segsize is always wal_segment_size, segsize argument seems
> not necessary in XLogWriteFile().
Right. I fixed it.
> +XLogWriteFile(int fd, const void *buf, size_t nbyte, off_t offset,
> + TimeLineID timelineid, XLogSegNo segno, int segsize)
>
> Why did you use "const void *" instead of "char *" for *buf?
I followed the argument of pg_pwrite().
But, I think "char *" is better, so fixed it.
> Regarding 0005 patch, I will review it later.
Thanks.
Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a7a94d2a83..df028c5039 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -771,6 +771,9 @@ WalRcvDie(int code, Datum arg)
/* Ensure that all WAL records received are flushed to disk */
XLogWalRcvFlush(true);
+ /* Send WAL statistics to the stats collector before terminating */
+ pgstat_send_wal(true);
+
/* Mark ourselves inactive in shared memory */
SpinLockAcquire(>mutex);
Assert(walrcv->walRcvState == WALRCV_STREAMING ||
@@ -910,6 +913,12 @@ XLogWalRcvWrite(char *buf, Size nbytes, XLogRecPtr recptr)
XLogArchiveForceDone(xlogfname);
else
XLogArchiveNotify(xlogfname);
+
+/*
+ * Send WAL statistics to the stats collector when finishing
+ * the current WAL segment file to avoid overloading it.
+ */
+pgstat_send_wal(false);
}
recvFile = -1;
diff --git a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
index bd5e787e55..4c7d90f1b9 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
@@ -2536,61 +2536,14 @@
It is not documented that pg_promote can exit standby mode
Hi, The document(high-availability.sgml) says that there are only two ways to exit standby mode. 26.2.2. Standby Server Operation Standby mode is exited and the server switches to normal operation when pg_ctl promote is run or a trigger file is found (promote_trigger_file). But there is another way, by calling pg_promote function. I think we need to document it, doesn't it? I attached a patch. Please review and let me know your thoughts. Regards, Masahiro IkedaFrom 719b754c36f4537aaab7c6de1951d7b7ec4759f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masahiro Ikeda Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 08:34:55 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] fix doc about the way to exit standby mode --- doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml index 4659b9e..88bf960 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml @@ -644,8 +644,8 @@ protocol to make nodes agree on a serializable transactional order. Standby mode is exited and the server switches to normal operation -when pg_ctl promote is run or a trigger file is found -(promote_trigger_file). Before failover, +when pg_ctl promote is run, pg_promote is called, +or a trigger file is found(promote_trigger_file). Before failover, any WAL immediately available in the archive or in pg_wal will be restored, but no attempt is made to connect to the master. -- 1.8.3.1
