Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote: > Could you rebase the v11 patch? This patch has been waiting for a rebase for more than three weeks as of today, I am marking it as returned with feedback. It would be a good idea to reply to Robert's input in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyybnv-ddhvpmxlb2nx2sqenjirtwhmdeazucgotb2...@mail.gmail.com. -- Michael
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Hello Michaël, Could you rebase the v11 patch? This patch has been waiting for a rebase for more than three weeks as of today, I am marking it as returned with feedback. It would be a good idea to reply to Robert's input in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyybnv-ddhvpmxlb2nx2sqenjirtwhmdeazucgotb2...@mail.gmail.com. ISTM that this was done: If -c is high enough, pgbench fails without the patch. -- Fabien.
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote: > Could you rebase the v11 patch? This patch has been waiting for a rebase for more than three weeks as of today, I am marking it as returned with feedback. It would be a good idea to reply to Robert's input in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyybnv-ddhvpmxlb2nx2sqenjirtwhmdeazucgotb2...@mail.gmail.com. -- Michael
Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Hello Michaël, Could you rebase the v11 patch? This patch has been waiting for a rebase for more than three weeks as of today, I am marking it as returned with feedback. It would be a good idea to reply to Robert's input in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ca+tgmoyybnv-ddhvpmxlb2nx2sqenjirtwhmdeazucgotb2...@mail.gmail.com. ISTM that this was done: If -c is high enough, pgbench fails without the patch. -- Fabien.
