Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"
Hi Tom, > They're both valid according to the dictionaries I looked > at, eg [1]. I don't feel a need to change anything. OK, thanks. And sorry for the noise. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"
Aleksander Alekseev writes: > I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling > "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is > the patch. They're both valid according to the dictionaries I looked at, eg [1]. I don't feel a need to change anything. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/implement
Re: [PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"
Hi hackers, > I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling > "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is > the patch. After a little more study I found evidence that both spellings can be acceptable [1]. As a non-native speaker I can't judge whether this is true or not and which spelling is preferable. I believe we should unify the spelling though. The reason why I initially thought "implementOr" is an incorrect spelling is because most spell-checking tools I personally use indicated so. [1] https://english.stackexchange.com/a/358111 -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
[PATCH] Replace "implementor" with "implementer"
Hi hackers, I noticed that there are several places where we use the spelling "implementOr" while the correct one seems to be "implementEr". Here is the patch. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev v1-0001-Fix-incorrect-spelling-of-the-word-implementer.patch Description: Binary data
