Re: Slightly improved meson error for docs tools
On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:05 PM Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > > Hi, > > > least lists what's expected -- I'm not sure if this is the way to go, > > or if we should somehow list the individual tools that are failing > > here? > > Personally I think the patch is OK. Thanks. I've pushed this one for now, we can always adjust further later if needed. -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Re: Slightly improved meson error for docs tools
Hi, > least lists what's expected -- I'm not sure if this is the way to go, > or if we should somehow list the individual tools that are failing > here? Personally I think the patch is OK. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
Slightly improved meson error for docs tools
The meson build doesn't tell you what tool is missing when trying to build the docs (and you don't have it in the path.. sigh), it just tells you that something is missing. Attached is a small patch that at least lists what's expected -- I'm not sure if this is the way to go, or if we should somehow list the individual tools that are failing here? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build index 57f9735feb..c317144b6b 100644 --- a/meson.build +++ b/meson.build @@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ if not docs_opt.disabled() if xmllint_bin.found() and xsltproc_bin.found() docs_dep = declare_dependency() elif docs_opt.enabled() -error('missing required tools for docs in HTML / man page format') +error('missing required tools (xmllint and xsltproc needed) for docs in HTML / man page format') endif endif