Re: [HACKERS] Parser Cruft in gram.y
> > > > The GLR output from Bison is licensed under the GPL (unlike the LALR > > output). > > So using Bison's GLR mode isn't an option. > > Thats not the case anymore: > http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/manual/html_node/Conditions.html Sorry! My mistake... I didn't realize they changed the rules. I'll be more careful to check these things in the future. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Parser Cruft in gram.y
> > Another way of attack along these lines might be to use the %glr-parser > and then try to cut back on all those redundant rules that were put in > to avoid conflicts. The number of key words categories and such could > perhaps also be reduced that way. > > Of course, this is mostly speculation. > > The GLR output from Bison is licensed under the GPL (unlike the LALR output). So using Bison's GLR mode isn't an option. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
