[HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?
I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) % /Developer/usr/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 --version i686-apple-darwin10-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2118) llvm-gcc-4.2 currently fails during check for the known directory problem under Snow Leopard as the regular gcc does. I tried HEAD, REL8_4_STABLE and REL8_3_STABLE. % /Developer/usr/bin/clang --version clang version 1.0 (http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/Apple/clang-23 exported ) clang fails to compile on HEAD, so I did no more checking on it. clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-no-cpp-precomp' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fwrapv' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-c' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-no-cpp-precomp' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-I/opt/local/ include' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-fwrapv' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-I.' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-I../../../src/ include' clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: '-I/opt/local/ include/libxml2' In file included from gram.c:1: In file included from gram.y:29784: scan.l:16639:83: error: invalid conversion '%m' [-Wformat] elog_start(scan.l, 978, __func__), elog_finish(20, base_yylex_init() failed: %m); ~~~^~~ 1 diagnostic generated. make[3]: *** [gram.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [parser-recursive] Error 2 make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 Branch: HEAD Stage Make failed with status 2 Later, Rob smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:29:29PM -0600, Robert Creager wrote: I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) The more, the merrier :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter da...@fetter.org http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?
Robert Creager rob...@logicalchaos.org writes: I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) LLVM, perhaps, though are you sure that llvm and gcc aren't the same thing under the hood on SL? I thought I'd read somewhere that Apple had turned gcc into a wrapper around the llvm code generator. clang fails to compile on HEAD, so I did no more checking on it. I think that whatever version Apple is shipping on the DVD is probably not going to be very useful for us. Grzegorz Jaskiewicz was using bleeding-edge clang sources and still hitting bugs. Putting it in the buildfarm might be a good idea in a few more months, when more-stable clang versions are available. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Any interest in buildfarm a member using Apple's llvm-gcc-4.2 or clang?
On Sep 8, 2009, at 4:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Robert Creager rob...@logicalchaos.org writes: I'll set up one or two more 'machines' if there is interest (Snow Leopard) LLVM, perhaps, though are you sure that llvm and gcc aren't the same thing under the hood on SL? I thought I'd read somewhere that Apple had turned gcc into a wrapper around the llvm code generator. Well, the versions reported are definitely different. % gcc --version i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5646) rob...@dhcp-ubrm05-218-133:/usr/local/src/build-farm-3.2_llvm % /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 --version i686-apple-darwin10-llvm-gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5646) (LLVM build 2118) And the llvm tools you only get with the Xcode install, and the sizes of the two gcc compilers are very different. And, the llvm version takes the -flto, where the normal one doesn't: /Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/bin/llvm-gcc-4.2 -flto main.c -o main_llvm /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 -flto main.c -o main_gcc cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -flto make: *** [main_gcc] Error 1 -flto Enable LLVM Link Time Optimization. And, the binaries are different for the same simple program. So, I'm convinced they are different (where I wasn't sure before). Later, Rob smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
