And if so, would you mind stopping your mail system from regurgitating
copies of pghackers traffic? It's especially bad that you're sending
the stuff with a fraudulent envelope From, ie, one not pointing back
at yourself.
Feb 13 16:55:12 sss2 sm-mta[5221]: k1DLtBSE005221: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=3848, class=-60, nrcpts=1, msgid=[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=mail.presinet.com [209.53.156.1]
regards, tom lane
--- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon Feb 13 16:55:12 2006
Received: from presinet.com (mail.presinet.com [209.53.156.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DLtBSE005221
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:55:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail pickup service by presinet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:01 -0800
PureMessageGuid: {E36E9D67-EA8E-4442-967E-4498D1B5B218}
thread-index: AcYw3I3TqJS4sUupQgat6sCKlhTSRQ==
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=icR9BrBytqB8dsAOy5PPJzcfCHQZHPUbun6svoYP1+38ySIlmhOInNmPyDSuRIWHsQF3yQmiCI2FyUCMV0yuethFeV6IlgoVO+ZQOCvmh8AZLYjGeVNwkXMGtd0hqeswX9ULnEOIyDyZI3nOy9YI/9LGiajHGfkEm4M7mnBop84=
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:51:00 -0800
From: Gregory Maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000
To: Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Cc: Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Euler Taveira de Oliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim C. Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andreas Pflug [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Priority: normal
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830
Content-Disposition: inline
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.027 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027]
X-Spam-Score: 0.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers
List-Archive: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers
List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: pgsql-hackers.postgresql.org
List-Owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Post: mailto:pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
List-Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-unconfigured-debian-site-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-unconfigured-debian-site-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2006 20:32:05.0609 (UTC)
FILETIME=[8DC53D90:01C630DC]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sss.pgh.pa.us id
k1DLtBSE005221
On 2/13/06, Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well as one of the people that deploys and managees many, many
postgresql installations I can say I have never run into the need to
have dns names and the thought of dns names honestly seems silly. It
will increase overhead and dependencies that I just wouldn't want in my
installations.
It is not uncommon for an environment that has already suffered
through one forced renumbering to forbid the use of hard set IPs in
application software.
With IPv6 we will just see more and more of that.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--- End of Forwarded Message
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
