Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2007-02-08 Thread Larry Rosenman
I can set up build farm on it if yall need it.  Its running 6.2/amd64

--- Original Message ---
From: "Andrew Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: " Larry Rosenman " 
Sent: 2/8/07, 12:19:07 PM
Subject: Re: BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
> >> on.
>
> >> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> >> My questions are:
> >> 1) do we need another one?
> >> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
>
> > Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready.  Are you
> > willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?
>
> Not particularly, as I want it to do other things.  However, I might be
> willing
> To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.
>
> What were you thinking?


FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2007-02-08 Thread Andrew Hammond
On Jan 19 2006, 9:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Larry Rosenman") wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> I've got a fastFreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
> >> on.
>
> >> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
>
> >> My questions are:
> >> 1) do we need another one?
> >> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
>
> > Looks like we're fairly well covered onfreebsdalready.  Are you
> > willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?
>
> Not particularly, as I want it to do other things.  However, I might be
> willing
> To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.
>
> What were you thinking?


FreeBSD 6.2 was just released. I don't see any coverage for it yet.


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2006-01-20 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 07:16:03PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.
> 
> > However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
> 
> > My questions are:
> > 1) do we need another one?
> > 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
> 
> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already.  Are you
> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

Out of curiosity, is there any benefit to improving SMP versus
single-proc coverage?
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pervasive Software  http://pervasive.comwork: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf   cell: 512-569-9461

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2006-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Larry Rosenman"  writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already.  Are you
>> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it? 

> What were you thinking?

[ shrug... ]  Anything you don't see paired with amd64 on the buildfarm
roster is OK by me ...

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2006-01-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm
>> on. 
> 
>> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.
> 
>> My questions are:
>> 1) do we need another one?
>> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?
> 
> Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already.  Are you
> willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it? 

Not particularly, as I want it to do other things.  However, I might be
willing
To get VMWare running on it, and run something else in a VM.

What were you thinking?

LER

-- 
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2006-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
"Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.

> However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

> My questions are:
> 1) do we need another one?
> 2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Looks like we're fairly well covered on freebsd already.  Are you
willing to consider running some less-popular OS on it?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


[HACKERS] BuildFarm: Do we need another FreeBSD/amd64 member?

2006-01-19 Thread Larry Rosenman
Greetings,
I've got a fast FreeBSD/amd64 server available to run Buildfarm on.

However, I see we already have a couple of others running it.

My questions are:
1) do we need another one?
2) if yes, what options need coverage?

Thanks,
LER


-- 
Larry Rosenman  
Database Support Engineer

PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX  78727-6531 

Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.pervasive.com 

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly