Re: [HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-14 Thread Thomas Lockhart

  Oh yeah. We don't have a date_part(units, time) function defined, so it
  is getting converted to interval (which in other contexts *does* have
  some usefulness as a time equivalent).
 You're going to have an extremely hard time convincing me of that.

OK, thanks for the warning. I'll try later when I have more time...

  We could fairly easily define a date_part() for the time and timetz data
  types.
 I had figured that time would be cast to timestamp.  Which is probably
 what it used to do.

Tom Lane pointed out the problem of inferring an appropriate date for
the upcast.

   - Thomas

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Thomas Lockhart writes:

 Oh yeah. We don't have a date_part(units, time) function defined, so it
 is getting converted to interval (which in other contexts *does* have
 some usefulness as a time equivalent).

You're going to have an extremely hard time convincing me of that.

 We could fairly easily define a date_part() for the time and timetz data
 types.

I had figured that time would be cast to timestamp.  Which is probably
what it used to do.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



Re: [HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-13 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Tom Lane writes:

 Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I had figured that time would be cast to timestamp.

 How would you do that?  With no date available, you're short all the
 high-order bits ...

For the purpose of extracting the fields that time does provide, namely
hour, minute, and second, it wouldn't matter.  At least it gives me a much
better feeling than casting to interval, which is a completely different
kind of quantity.

Of course, a separate date_part for time and date would make the most
sense.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



Re: [HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-12 Thread Thomas Lockhart

   peter=# SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM TIME '20:38:40');
   ERROR:  Interval units 'dow' not recognized
   The expression is nonsensical, but so is the result.
  Hmm. Why is the result nonsensical? day of week does not have meaning
  for intervals, so it should not be recognized, right?
 It's the interval part that's troubling me, since it appears nowhere in
 the original expression.

Oh yeah. We don't have a date_part(units, time) function defined, so it
is getting converted to interval (which in other contexts *does* have
some usefulness as a time equivalent).

We could fairly easily define a date_part() for the time and timetz data
types.

  - Thomas

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html



Re: [HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-11 Thread Thomas Lockhart

 Just updated...
 peter=# SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40');
 ERROR:  Timestamp with time zone units 'dow' not recognized
 This is documented to work.

Ah, I broke this with some recent additions to implement more ISO
conventions (I changed the behavior of the date/time parser so that it
does not willingly ignore unrecognized fields).

I see the problem and the solution, but am in the middle of a few
changes to SET code and can't test at the moment. Hopefully I'll get
this fixed in the next couple of days, and if not I'll get it done early
next week.

Would you like to add some tests to the regression suite? Clearly this
isn't covered there...

 peter=# SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM TIME '20:38:40');
 ERROR:  Interval units 'dow' not recognized
 The expression is nonsensical, but so is the result.

Hmm. Why is the result nonsensical? day of week does not have meaning
for intervals, so it should not be recognized, right?

It is the same result as saying

  SELECT timestamp_part('yabadabadoo', time '20:38:40');

   - Thomas

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster



[HACKERS] EXTRACT broken

2001-10-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Just updated...

peter=# SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM TIMESTAMP '2001-02-16 20:38:40');
ERROR:  Timestamp with time zone units 'dow' not recognized

This is documented to work.

peter=# SELECT EXTRACT(DOW FROM TIME '20:38:40');
ERROR:  Interval units 'dow' not recognized

The expression is nonsensical, but so is the result.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html