Re: [HACKERS] Range types do not display in pg_stats
On 09/19/2013 02:55 PM, Mike Blackwell wrote: Interesting. Is this a 9.3 issue? I ran the above against my 9.2.4 server and got no rows in pg_stats. Did I miss something? Yeah, that was on 9.3. I think the issue on 9.2 is the same, it just expresses differently. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Range types do not display in pg_stats
Robert, It probably has to do with the CASE stakind stuff in the definition of the pg_stats view. Try \d+ pg_stats to see what I mean. Ok, if this is not a known bug, I'll see if I can work up a fix. No promises, given the hairyness ... -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] Range types do not display in pg_stats
create table tstztest( trange tstzrange );
postgres=# insert into tstztest select tstzrange(t, t + interval '1 month')
from generate_series('2012-01-01'::timestamptz,'2018-01-01','1 month')
as gs(t);
INSERT 0 73
postgres=# analyze tstztest;
ANALYZE
postgres=# select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'tstztest';
schemaname | tablename | attname | inherited | null_frac | avg_width |
n_distinct | most_common_vals | most_common_freqs | histogram_bounds
| correlation | most_common_elems | most_common_elem_freqs |
elem_count_histogram
+---+-+---+---+---++--+---+--
+-+---++--
public | tstztest | trange | f | 0 |22 |
-1 | | |
| | ||
Now, there actually *is* a histogram for the column, which you can find
via pg_statistic. But is shows up as NULL in pg_stats view.
If this is a known issue, we ought to at least add it to the docs.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Range types do not display in pg_stats
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
create table tstztest( trange tstzrange );
postgres=# insert into tstztest select tstzrange(t, t + interval '1 month')
from generate_series('2012-01-01'::timestamptz,'2018-01-01','1 month')
as gs(t);
INSERT 0 73
postgres=# analyze tstztest;
ANALYZE
postgres=# select * from pg_stats where tablename = 'tstztest';
schemaname | tablename | attname | inherited | null_frac | avg_width |
n_distinct | most_common_vals | most_common_freqs | histogram_bounds
| correlation | most_common_elems | most_common_elem_freqs |
elem_count_histogram
+---+-+---+---+---++--+---+--
+-+---++--
public | tstztest | trange | f | 0 |22 |
-1 | | |
| | ||
Now, there actually *is* a histogram for the column, which you can find
via pg_statistic. But is shows up as NULL in pg_stats view.
If this is a known issue, we ought to at least add it to the docs.
It probably has to do with the CASE stakind stuff in the definition of
the pg_stats view. Try \d+ pg_stats to see what I mean.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
