Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Boszormenyi Zoltan  writes:
> Alvaro Herrera írta:
>> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
>> right now so that it appears in 9.0.  No point in waiting for 9.0.1.

> It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time
> and no one else knows ECPG in depth. So...

Yeah.  I think what Michael is saying is he doesn't have time to review
the patch now and doesn't want to hold up 9.0 until he does.  We can
delay 9.0 for him, or apply the patch unreviewed, or allow 9.0 to go out
with this as a known bug.  I don't much care for #2, given the size of
the patch.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
Alvaro Herrera írta:
> Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
>   
>> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG 
>> versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. 
>> Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new 
>> feature, however not such a major one that it warrants the complete removal 
>> IMO. I'd prefer to fix this in 9.0.1.
>> 
>
> Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
> right now so that it appears in 9.0.  No point in waiting for 9.0.1.
>   

It boils down to the fact that Michael doesn't have too much time
and no one else knows ECPG in depth. So...


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Michael Meskes's message of jue ago 05 05:39:46 -0400 2010:
> Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG 
> versions were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. 
> Apparently only this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new 
> feature, however not such a major one that it warrants the complete removal 
> IMO. I'd prefer to fix this in 9.0.1.

Since we're still in the beta phase, it makes sense to apply the fix
right now so that it appears in 9.0.  No point in waiting for 9.0.1.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] ECPG dynamic cursor fix for UPDATE/DELETE ... WHERE CURRENT OF :curname

2010-08-05 Thread Michael Meskes
Sorry I thought Zoltan's explanation was clear enough. All prior ECPG versions 
were fine because dynamic cursor names were only added in 9.0. Apparently only 
this one place was missed. So this is a bug in the new feature, however not 
such a major one that it warrants the complete removal IMO. I'd prefer to fix 
this in 9.0.1.

Hope this cleans it up a bit.

Michael 


"Kevin Grittner"  schrieb:

>Michael Meskes  wrote:
> 
>> I'd consider this a bug.
> 
>Could you explain why?  The assertions that people consider it a bug
>without explanation of *why* is confusing for me.
> 
>It sounds more like a feature of the ECPG interface that people
>would really like, and which has been technically possible since
>PostgreSQL 8.3, but for which nobody submitted a patch until this
>week.  There was some hint that a 9.0 ECPG patch added new features
>which might make people expect this feature to have also been added.
>If this patch isn't necessarily correct, and would be dangerous to
>apply at this point, should the other patch be reverted as something
>which shouldn't go out without this feature?
> 
>-Kevin

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers