[HACKERS] Re: [WIP] Support for ANY/ALL(array) op scalar (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)

2011-06-19 Thread Greg Stark
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
  (I will refrain for
 the moment from speculating whether we'll ever have an index type that
 supports regexp match directly as an indexable operator...)

Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone is
keen to try it.

-- 
greg

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Re: [WIP] Support for ANY/ALL(array) op scalar (Was: Re: Boolean operators without commutators vs. ALL/ANY)

2011-06-19 Thread David Fetter
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 02:48:58PM +0100, Greg Stark wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:11 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
  (I will refrain for the moment from speculating whether we'll ever
  have an index type that supports regexp match directly as an
  indexable operator...)
 
 Fwiw I looked into this at one point and have some ideas if anyone
 is keen to try it.

Please post them :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter da...@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter  XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers