Re: [HACKERS] Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c

2017-06-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 6/28/17 09:53, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> Attached is a fix for a small typo I found.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c

2017-06-28 Thread Albe Laurenz
Attached is a fix for a small typo I found.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


comment.patch
Description: comment.patch

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c

2017-01-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:45 PM, Etsuro Fujita
 wrote:
> I ran into a typo in a comment in contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c.
> Attached is a small patch for fixing that.

Committed, thanks.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c

2017-01-26 Thread Etsuro Fujita

Hi,

I ran into a typo in a comment in contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c.  
Attached is a small patch for fixing that.


Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
diff --git a/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c b/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
index fbe6929..7cb9dc5 100644
--- a/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
+++ b/contrib/postgres_fdw/postgres_fdw.c
@@ -4218,7 +4218,7 @@ foreign_join_ok(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *joinrel, JoinType jointype,
 	/*
 	 * If user is willing to estimate cost for a scan of either of the joining
 	 * relations using EXPLAIN, he intends to estimate scans on that relation
-	 * more accurately. Then, it makes sense to estimate the cost the join
+	 * more accurately. Then, it makes sense to estimate the cost of the join
 	 * with that relation more accurately using EXPLAIN.
 	 */
 	fpinfo->use_remote_estimate = fpinfo_o->use_remote_estimate ||

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers