Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. Because you don't use Windows. On a personal level, I couldn't agree more. But I have been in a project where they chose MySQL because it had to run on Windows. I would like to be able to propose a free alternative. -- Kaare Rasmussen--Linux, spil,--Tlf:3816 2582 Kaki Datatshirts, merchandize Fax:3816 2501 Howitzvej 75 Åben 12.00-18.00Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2000 FrederiksbergLørdag 12.00-16.00 Web: www.suse.dk ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?
IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. --- Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For MySQL: There is no Cygwin needed. Period. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - who cares?
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 22:30:45 -0800, ow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO, replication, performance improvements, cross-db queries, etc is much better use of time than Windows port. Welcome to open source where individual people get to decide what is most important to spend their time on. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
