[HACKERS] another mvcc.sgml typo

2011-02-09 Thread Kevin Grittner
Trivial patch attached.
 
-Kevin

*** a/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/mvcc.sgml
***
*** 604,610  ERROR:  could not serialize access due to read/write 
dependencies among transact
  Consistent use of Serializable transactions can simplify development.
  The guarantee that any set of concurrent serializable transactions will
  have the same effect as if they were run one at a time means that if
! you can demonstrate that a singe transaction, as written, will do the
  right thing when run by itself, you can have confidence that it will
  do the right thing in any mix of serializable transactions, even without
  any information about what those other transactions might do.  It is
--- 604,610 
  Consistent use of Serializable transactions can simplify development.
  The guarantee that any set of concurrent serializable transactions will
  have the same effect as if they were run one at a time means that if
! you can demonstrate that a single transaction, as written, will do the
  right thing when run by itself, you can have confidence that it will
  do the right thing in any mix of serializable transactions, even without
  any information about what those other transactions might do.  It is

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] another mvcc.sgml typo

2011-02-09 Thread Itagaki Takahiro
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:30, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
 Trivial patch attached.

Applied. Thanks!

-- 
Itagaki Takahiro

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers