Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-10-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 15:17 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
 
  I'm not exactly sure what the goal is, however.  You built the
  documentation at some point.  Then it gets updated when necessary.  You
  can delete the documentation by running make -C doc maintainer-clean.
  Then it's gone forever and never reappears unless you explicitly build
  it again.
 
 I think this bit is missing something; the html-stamp file is created on
 the builddir, but maintainer-clean is trying to delete it from the
 source dir.

Yeah, I missed something there, apparently.  I don't use vpath builds so
much, so if you find more things like that, please clean them up or tell
me.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-10-01 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Peter Eisentraut wrote:

 I'm not exactly sure what the goal is, however.  You built the
 documentation at some point.  Then it gets updated when necessary.  You
 can delete the documentation by running make -C doc maintainer-clean.
 Then it's gone forever and never reappears unless you explicitly build
 it again.

I think this bit is missing something; the html-stamp file is created on
the builddir, but maintainer-clean is trying to delete it from the
source dir.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Sometime since Friday, somebody (probably Peter) fixed things so that
make install at the top level of the tree insists on building the SGML
documentation first.  I regard this as utterly unacceptable; if I'm just
trying to build a new test installation (which I often do multiple times
per day), I do not wish to wait around for the SGML docs to be built.
Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
done make distprep, instead?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 11:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Sometime since Friday, somebody (probably Peter) fixed things so that
 make install at the top level of the tree insists on building the SGML
 documentation first.  I regard this as utterly unacceptable; if I'm just
 trying to build a new test installation (which I often do multiple times
 per day), I do not wish to wait around for the SGML docs to be built.
 Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
 done make distprep, instead?

That's pretty much how it is supposed to work.  I can't reproduce the
problem you are describing.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
 On tis, 2009-08-18 at 11:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Sometime since Friday, somebody (probably Peter) fixed things so that
 make install at the top level of the tree insists on building the SGML
 documentation first.  I regard this as utterly unacceptable; if I'm just
 trying to build a new test installation (which I often do multiple times
 per day), I do not wish to wait around for the SGML docs to be built.
 Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
 done make distprep, instead?

 That's pretty much how it is supposed to work.  I can't reproduce the
 problem you are describing.

Hmm ... configure on a machine that has docbook, make at top level,
then make install at top level.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Andrew Dunstan



Tom Lane wrote:

Sometime since Friday, somebody (probably Peter) fixed things so that
make install at the top level of the tree insists on building the SGML
documentation first.  I regard this as utterly unacceptable; if I'm just
trying to build a new test installation (which I often do multiple times
per day), I do not wish to wait around for the SGML docs to be built.
Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
done make distprep, instead?


  


Doesn't seem to be happening for me:

http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dungbeetledt=2009-08-18%20064401stg=make-install

shows this at the top:

   make -C doc install
   make[1]: Entering directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc'
   make -C src install
   make[2]: Entering directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc/src'
   make -C sgml install
   make[3]: Entering directory 
`/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc/src/sgml'
   make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install'.
   make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc/src/sgml'
   make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc/src'
   make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.13422/doc'



cheers

andrew


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
 Tom Lane wrote:
 Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
 done make distprep, instead?

 Doesn't seem to be happening for me:
 http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dungbeetledt=2009-08-18%20064401stg=make-install

It happens for me on my Fedora box, but not on my HPUX box.  I suppose
that the significant difference is the HPUX box doesn't have the docbook
tools installed.  If you have evidence to the contrary, maybe there's
some subtle gmake version issue here?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 12:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
  Tom Lane wrote:
  Please fix.  Maybe installing the docs could be conditional on having
  done make distprep, instead?
 
  Doesn't seem to be happening for me:
  http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dungbeetledt=2009-08-18%20064401stg=make-install
 
 It happens for me on my Fedora box, but not on my HPUX box.  I suppose
 that the significant difference is the HPUX box doesn't have the docbook
 tools installed.  If you have evidence to the contrary, maybe there's
 some subtle gmake version issue here?

Assuming no tool bugs, the only way I can see this happening is if you
already have built the documentation.  Then, make install might cause it
to be re-built if dependencies require it.

make -n --debug -C doc install might help analyze it.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
 On tis, 2009-08-18 at 12:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 It happens for me on my Fedora box, but not on my HPUX box.

 Assuming no tool bugs, the only way I can see this happening is if you
 already have built the documentation.  Then, make install might cause it
 to be re-built if dependencies require it.

Um, that might be it.  I did what I usually do:
make distclean
cvs update
configure ...
make
make install
but now that you mention it, I might have built the docs in that
tree yesterday, and make distclean no longer cleans them out.
[ checks overnight backups ... ] Yup, that's it: html/ and html-stamp
were present in doc/src/sgml/ early this morning.

I could avoid the unwanted build by changing the first step to
make maintainer-clean, but that's not tremendously satisfactory
either, given how slow it is to regenerate the derived ecpg files.

Is it sensible to split out docs installation to a separate target
make install-docs?  Or is there some other solution?

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Josh Berkus
On 8/18/09 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
 Is it sensible to split out docs installation to a separate target
 make install-docs?  Or is there some other solution?

I'd like to have this.  There are times I want to *only* build the docs.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 13:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
  On tis, 2009-08-18 at 12:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
  It happens for me on my Fedora box, but not on my HPUX box.
 
  Assuming no tool bugs, the only way I can see this happening is if you
  already have built the documentation.  Then, make install might cause it
  to be re-built if dependencies require it.
 
 Um, that might be it.  I did what I usually do:
   make distclean
   cvs update
   configure ...
   make
   make install
 but now that you mention it, I might have built the docs in that
 tree yesterday, and make distclean no longer cleans them out.
 [ checks overnight backups ... ] Yup, that's it: html/ and html-stamp
 were present in doc/src/sgml/ early this morning.

Still, the documentation should only be rebuilt if any of its
dependencies have changed, not every time you run make or make install.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 10:50 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
 On 8/18/09 10:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
  Is it sensible to split out docs installation to a separate target
  make install-docs?  Or is there some other solution?
 
 I'd like to have this.  There are times I want to *only* build the docs.

make html

Has nothing to do with this, really.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
 On tis, 2009-08-18 at 13:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 but now that you mention it, I might have built the docs in that
 tree yesterday, and make distclean no longer cleans them out.
 [ checks overnight backups ... ] Yup, that's it: html/ and html-stamp
 were present in doc/src/sgml/ early this morning.

 Still, the documentation should only be rebuilt if any of its
 dependencies have changed, not every time you run make or make install.

Well, Teodor's commit today did include doc updates.

I'm leaning more towards the make install-docs solution after further
thought.  One thing that's always been a bit bogus about make install
is that it installs the docs only if they're there.  With a separate
top-level target, it would be reasonable to throw an error if the
docs aren't there and can't be built.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 14:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 I'm leaning more towards the make install-docs solution after further
 thought.  One thing that's always been a bit bogus about make install
 is that it installs the docs only if they're there.  With a separate
 top-level target, it would be reasonable to throw an error if the
 docs aren't there and can't be built.

I don't think we should impose an additional burden on the users because
of some glitches in the workflow of some developers.  There can be
another solution.  We can add an option or a make target or whatever to
refine the behavior in a developer environment.

I'm not exactly sure what the goal is, however.  You built the
documentation at some point.  Then it gets updated when necessary.  You
can delete the documentation by running make -C doc maintainer-clean.
Then it's gone forever and never reappears unless you explicitly build
it again.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
 On tis, 2009-08-18 at 14:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 I'm leaning more towards the make install-docs solution after further
 thought.  One thing that's always been a bit bogus about make install
 is that it installs the docs only if they're there.  With a separate
 top-level target, it would be reasonable to throw an error if the
 docs aren't there and can't be built.

 I don't think we should impose an additional burden on the users because
 of some glitches in the workflow of some developers.  There can be
 another solution.  We can add an option or a make target or whatever to
 refine the behavior in a developer environment.

Well, having make install behave in a history-dependent fashion is just
as much a hazard for users as it is for developers.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On tis, 2009-08-18 at 15:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
  On tis, 2009-08-18 at 14:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
  I'm leaning more towards the make install-docs solution after further
  thought.  One thing that's always been a bit bogus about make install
  is that it installs the docs only if they're there.  With a separate
  top-level target, it would be reasonable to throw an error if the
  docs aren't there and can't be built.
 
  I don't think we should impose an additional burden on the users because
  of some glitches in the workflow of some developers.  There can be
  another solution.  We can add an option or a make target or whatever to
  refine the behavior in a developer environment.
 
 Well, having make install behave in a history-dependent fashion is just
 as much a hazard for users as it is for developers.

That's kind of a built-in feature of make.  Otherwise we could write the
build rules as shell scripts. ;-)

Anyway, a simple fix that doesn't upset too many things would be to
remove the dependencies

install-html: html
install-man: man



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] make install now tries to build the documentation

2009-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
 On tis, 2009-08-18 at 15:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Well, having make install behave in a history-dependent fashion is just
 as much a hazard for users as it is for developers.

 That's kind of a built-in feature of make.  Otherwise we could write the
 build rules as shell scripts. ;-)

Well, no -- make is supposed to skip redundant build steps while
producing the specified outputs.  It's not supposed to skip producing
the outputs.

 Anyway, a simple fix that doesn't upset too many things would be to
 remove the dependencies

 install-html: html
 install-man: man

That doesn't really make me feel more comfortable.  It would
alleviate my immediate complaint, but also introduce the possibility of
accidentally installing obsolete docs.  OTOH I suppose the probability
of an actual problem of that sort is low, and we've been living with
essentially equivalent install behavior for a long time.

regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers