-----Original Message-----
From: Merlin Moncure 
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:47 PM
To: 'Peter Eisentraut'
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] XML ouput for psql

My 0.2$: keep the xml formatting rules as simple as possible and rely on
xslt to do the document markup (going out) and schemas/xslt to do the
validation (going in).  This would allow flexibility for any type of
application.  Without that stuff just do very basic
<column>data</column>.

There are many excellent free tools for xml manipulation which imho are
the best thing about xml.

Xml datasets that are not nested tend to get verbose :(

Merlin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 12:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: PostgreSQL Development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] XML ouput for psql
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> > I don't agree with this: XML and XHTML are two different things.
> 
> No one claimed anything to the contrary.
> 
> > We could certainly upgrade the HTML portion, but I am pretty sure
that
> > the XML standard calls for this format:
> >
> > <columnname>data here</columnname>
> 
> The XML standard does not call for any table format.  But a number of
> table formats have been established within the XML framework.  Some of
> them are formatting-oriented (e.g., the HTML model, or CALS which is
used
> in DocBook) and some of them are processing-oriented (e.g., SQL/XML).
> Which do we need?  And which do we need from psql in particular
(keeping
> in mind that psql is primarily for interactive use and
shell-scripting)?
> In any case, it should most likely be a standard table model and not a
> hand-crafted one.
> 
> (If, for whatever reason, we go the "processing-oriented" route, then
I
> claim that there should not be a different output with and without \x
> mode.)
> 
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Reply via email to