Re: [HACKERS] Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:09:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: The bug reporter is in error to be claiming he is running 7.3.3, because the assert() in question is at line 334 not 331 in 7.3.3. He may have 7.3.3 client libraries, but he must be talking to a server version between 7.3 and 7.3.2. I believe the bug probably is the same one reported/fixed here: Thanks Tom. I will get into contact with the submitter and make sure he's not having problems with 7.3.3. Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [HACKERS] Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3
Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone know this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204000 The bug reporter is in error to be claiming he is running 7.3.3, because the assert() in question is at line 334 not 331 in 7.3.3. He may have 7.3.3 client libraries, but he must be talking to a server version between 7.3 and 7.3.2. I believe the bug probably is the same one reported/fixed here: 2003-04-20 13:37 tgl * src/backend/regex/regcomp.c (REL7_3_STABLE): Fix char-vs-pg_wchar confusion in p_ere(), per failure report from Tom O'Dowd. This fix is not relevant to CVS tip anymore, but we should fix it in 7.3.*. which would mean that it is indeed fixed in 7.3.3. I suppose the reason Oliver never forwarded this report is he couldn't duplicate it... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 17:09, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Does anyone know this bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=204000 The bug reporter is in error to be claiming he is running 7.3.3, because the assert() in question is at line 334 not 331 in 7.3.3. He may have 7.3.3 client libraries, but he must be talking to a server version between 7.3 and 7.3.2. This is curious because the version numbers are automatically generated by reportbug and he gives no hint that he is talking to a different machine. However I verified that the assertion is at line 334 in the source code that the package was compiled from. I believe the bug probably is the same one reported/fixed here: 2003-04-20 13:37 tgl * src/backend/regex/regcomp.c (REL7_3_STABLE): Fix char-vs-pg_wchar confusion in p_ere(), per failure report from Tom O'Dowd. This fix is not relevant to CVS tip anymore, but we should fix it in 7.3.*. which would mean that it is indeed fixed in 7.3.3. I suppose the reason Oliver never forwarded this report is he couldn't duplicate it... It's more because I was away at the time fetching my mother-in-law from Israel, so this bug never got dealt with at all :-( But I do have problems with these character set bugs, since it took a long time to find a way to see these characters correctly. I can confirm it does not happen in 7.4beta4 -- Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C Commit thy way unto the LORD; trust also in him and he shall bring it to pass. Psalms 37:5 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
