Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not > > used. > > That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything > that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior? Hi, I've been testing a little more further and found that (with-openssl) if initdb is done with LANG=C, int8 test succeeds if initdb is done with LANG=fr int8 test fails. I'll try nowwithout openssl and LANG=fr Regards > > regards, tom lane > -- Olivier PRENANT Tel:+33-5-61-50-97-00 (Work) Quartier d'Harraud Turrou +33-5-61-50-97-01 (Fax) 31190 AUTERIVE +33-6-07-63-80-64 (GSM) FRANCE Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Make your life a dream, make your dream a reality. (St Exupery)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
o.a(rand_win.o) libcrypto.a(evp_pkey.o) libcrypto.a(a_bitstr.o) libcrypto.a(a_utctm.o) libcrypto.a(a_gentm.o) libcrypto.a(a_time.o) libcrypto.a(a_int.o) libcrypto.a(a_octet.o) libcrypto.a(a_print.o) libcrypto.a(a_type.o) libcrypto.a(a_set.o) libcrypto.a(a_d2i_fp.o) libcrypto.a(a_i2d_fp.o) libcrypto.a(a_enum.o) libcrypto.a(a_vis.o) libcrypto.a(a_utf8.o) libcrypto.a(a_sign.o) libcrypto.a(a_digest.o) libcrypto.a(a_verify.o) libcrypto.a(x_algor.o) libcrypto.a(x_pubkey.o) libcrypto.a(x_req.o) libcrypto.a(x_attrib.o) libcrypto.a(x_cinf.o) libcrypto.a(x_crl.o) libcrypto.a(x_info.o) libcrypto.a(x_spki.o) libcrypto.a(nsseq.o) libcrypto.a(d2i_r_pu.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_r_pu.o) libcrypto.a(d2i_s_pr.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_s_pr.o) libcrypto.a(d2i_pu.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_pu.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_pr.o) libcrypto.a(t_x509.o) libcrypto.a(t_x509a.o) libcrypto.a(t_pkey.o) libcrypto.a(p7_i_s.o) libcrypto.a(p7_lib.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_dsap.o) libcrypto.a(d2i_dsap.o) libcrypto.a(x_pkey.o) libcrypto.a(x_exten.o) libcrypto.a(a_bytes.o) libcrypto.a(asn_pack.o) libcrypto.a(p8_pkey.o) libcrypto.a(pem_info.o) libcrypto.a(pem_lib.o) libcrypto.a(x509_def.o) libcrypto.a(x509name.o) libcrypto.a(x509_v3.o) libcrypto.a(v3_bcons.o) libcrypto.a(v3_bitst.o) libcrypto.a(v3_conf.o) libcrypto.a(v3_extku.o) libcrypto.a(v3_ia5.o) libcrypto.a(v3_prn.o) libcrypto.a(v3_utl.o) libcrypto.a(v3_genn.o) libcrypto.a(conf_lib.o) libcrypto.a(conf_api.o) libcrypto.a(conf_def.o) libcrypto.a(p12_add.o) libcrypto.a(p12_bags.o) libcrypto.a(p12_decr.o) libcrypto.a(p12_sbag.o) libcrypto.a(sha1_one.o) libcrypto.a(bn_add.o) libcrypto.a(bn_div.o) libcrypto.a(bn_print.o) libcrypto.a(bn_shift.o) libcrypto.a(bn_exp2.o) libcrypto.a(err_prn.o) libcrypto.a(encode.o) libcrypto.a(evp_key.o) libcrypto.a(x_val.o) libcrypto.a(d2i_s_pu.o) libcrypto.a(i2d_s_pu.o) libcrypto.a(p7_signd.o) libcrypto.a(p7_evp.o) libcrypto.a(p7_dgst.o) libcrypto.a(p7_s_e.o) libcrypto.a(p7_enc.o) libcrypto.a(a_bool.o) libcrypto.a(a_strnid.o) libcrypto.a(p5_pbe.o) libcrypto.a(p5_pbev2.o) libcrypto.a(x509_req.o) libcrypto.a(x509rset.o) libcrypto.a(x509_att.o) libcrypto.a(pk7_lib.o) libcrypto.a(read_pwd.o) libcrypto.a(a_mbstr.o) libcrypto.a(p7_signi.o) libcrypto.a(p7_recip.o) libcrypto.a(p7_enc_c.o) UX:ld: ERROR: relocations remain against non-writeable, allocatable section .text gmake[3]: *** [libpq.so.2.1] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/src/interfaces' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ler/pg-dev/pgsql/src' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > LER > > -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Rosenman > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? > > > Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not > > used. > > That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything > that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior? > > regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
RE: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Working on it. Give me a couple of hours. LER -Original Message- From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 11:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Larry Rosenman Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken? Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not > used. That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior? regards, tom lane
Re: [HACKERS] Re: int8 beta5 broken?
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry to follow-up on my own post; int8 test passes if open-ssl is not > used. That's difficult to believe, because int8.c doesn't include anything that even knows SSL exists. Larry, can you confirm this behavior? regards, tom lane
