Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Alvaro Herrera writes: > I've been trying to generate HTML from the SGML source here in Mandrake > Linux 8.1, and it needs some patching (Mdk Linux puts collateindex.pl in > /usr/bin rather that $DOCBOOKSTYLE/bin). I'll look at your patches soon. I've had some other ideas that I'd like to weave into this. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > I can do it hear easily. Let me know and I will give you the URL. It > > takes only 7 minutes here. > > Go ahead. Just make sure you use some reasonably recent style sheets (>= > 1.70) and not 1.64 that you currently have. I will not be able to upgrade the style sheets for a day. I remember sgml install as being quite complicated. Can you give me the URL for the new style sheets? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Bruce Momjian writes: > I can do it hear easily. Let me know and I will give you the URL. It > takes only 7 minutes here. Go ahead. Just make sure you use some reasonably recent style sheets (>= 1.70) and not 1.64 that you currently have. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
El Mar 26, Peter Eisentraut escribio: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > should there be a step in the 'build dist' > > that builds the docs based on the sgml? > > I've been promoting that every time this problem happens. And the problem > does happen every time we're making a minor release. I think it's about > time to clean this up. But it won't happen in the 7.2 branch anymore. Hello all: I've been trying to generate HTML from the SGML source here in Mandrake Linux 8.1, and it needs some patching (Mdk Linux puts collateindex.pl in /usr/bin rather that $DOCBOOKSTYLE/bin). I posted to pgsql-patches a one-liner that fixed a small problem, and later a patch to allow discovery of collateindex.pl, but the moderator apparently didn't bother to approve the second post. This still needs an autoconf macro to allow manpage building, 'cause docbook2man-spec.pl lives somewhere else than the Makefile expects. (Yes, I know I can set D2MDIR and DOCBOOKINDEX, but I think this is cleaner) This is the output of cvs diff -u config/docbook.m4 src/Makefile.global.in Index: config/docbook.m4 === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/config/docbook.m4,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 docbook.m4 --- config/docbook.m4 2000/11/05 21:04:06 1.1 +++ config/docbook.m4 2002/03/27 02:51:27 @@ -57,7 +57,8 @@ for pgac_postfix in \ sgml/stylesheets/nwalsh-modular \ sgml/stylesheets/docbook \ -sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular +sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular \ +sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets do pgac_candidate=$pgac_prefix/$pgac_infix/$pgac_postfix if test -r "$pgac_candidate/html/docbook.dsl" \ @@ -77,3 +78,26 @@ else AC_MSG_RESULT(no) fi])# PGAC_PATH_DOCBOOK_STYLESHEETS + +# PGAC_PATH_DOCBOOK_COLLATEINDEX +# -- +AC_DEFUN([PGAC_PATH_DOCBOOK_COLLATEINDEX], +[AC_MSG_CHECKING([for collateindex.pl]) +AC_CACHE_VAL([pgac_cv_path_collateindex], +[if test -n "$DOCBOOKINDEX"; then + pgac_cv_path_collateindex=$DOCBOOKINDEX +else + for pgac_prefix in $DOCBOOKSTYLE/bin /usr/bin; do +if test -x "$pgac_prefix/collateindex.pl"; then + pgac_cv_path_collateindex=$pgac_prefix/collateindex.pl + break +fi + done +fi]) +DOCBOOKINDEX=$pgac_cv_path_collateindex +AC_SUBST([DOCBOOKINDEX]) +if test -n "$DOCBOOKINDEX"; then + AC_MSG_RESULT([$DOCBOOKINDEX]) +else + AC_MSG_RESULT(no) +fi])# PGAC_PATH_DOCBOOK_COLLATEINDEX Index: src/Makefile.global.in === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/src/Makefile.global.in,v retrieving revision 1.143 diff -u -r1.143 Makefile.global.in --- src/Makefile.global.in 2002/03/13 00:05:02 1.143 +++ src/Makefile.global.in 2002/03/27 02:51:28 @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ have_docbook = @have_docbook@ DOCBOOKSTYLE = @DOCBOOKSTYLE@ +DOCBOOKINDEX = @DOCBOOKINDEX@ ## -- Alvaro Herrera () "La primera ley de las demostraciones en vivo es: no trate de usar el sistema. Escriba un guión que no toque nada para no causar daños." (Jakob Nielsen) ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > good point ... but, where should I be pulling from? ~ftp/pub/doc/7.2 > > contains .pdf files, which I didn't think we wanted to put into the > > distribution ... is there an alternative place I should be pulling docs > > >from then ~ftp/pub/dev/doc? > > No, there currently is no place where these docs are built, because this > is the first time we're releasing from this branch. I've been trying all > day to build them on postgresql.org, but that machine seems to be > incredibly slow right now. I'll try again later. I can do it hear easily. Let me know and I will give you the URL. It takes only 7 minutes here. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Marc G. Fournier writes: > good point ... but, where should I be pulling from? ~ftp/pub/doc/7.2 > contains .pdf files, which I didn't think we wanted to put into the > distribution ... is there an alternative place I should be pulling docs > >from then ~ftp/pub/dev/doc? No, there currently is no place where these docs are built, because this is the first time we're releasing from this branch. I've been trying all day to build them on postgresql.org, but that machine seems to be incredibly slow right now. I'll try again later. > should there be a step in the 'build dist' > that builds the docs based on the sgml? I've been promoting that every time this problem happens. And the problem does happen every time we're making a minor release. I think it's about time to clean this up. But it won't happen in the 7.2 branch anymore. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > should there be a step in the 'build dist' > that builds the docs based on the sgml? It would be a good idea to rebuild the 7.2 docs from 7.2.1 sources, as we made several important fixes in the documentation since 7.2 release. I dunno whether it's worth trying to make it fully automatic right at the moment, though. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
good point ... but, where should I be pulling from? ~ftp/pub/doc/7.2 contains .pdf files, which I didn't think we wanted to put into the distribution ... is there an alternative place I should be pulling docs from then ~ftp/pub/dev/doc? should there be a step in the 'build dist' that builds the docs based on the sgml? On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Marc G. Fournier writes: > > > Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks > > clean, sizes all look right ... > > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Other than the documentation issues, I confirm the tarball looks good from here. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Why? Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number? Shouldn't "major version" still be 7.2, and version be "7.2.1". i.e. "7.2.1" is a minor release/update/subversion of "7.2"? Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift > > -- > Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue > + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1. > > > Why? Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number? > > Did you look at how majorversion is used? > > Setting it to 7.2.1 is *clearly* wrong. Oh, I see, there is majorversion and version. I put majorversion back to 7.2. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1. > Why? Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number? Did you look at how majorversion is used? Setting it to 7.2.1 is *clearly* wrong. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand > > > the latter seems correct ... > > > > I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated, > > it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2. > > But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1. Why? Why shouldn't the documentation match the release number? -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Bruce Momjian writes: > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand > > the latter seems correct ... > > I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated, > it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2. But neither explanation warrants setting "majorversion" to 7.2.1. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Marc G. Fournier writes: > >> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks > >> clean, sizes all look right ... > > > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3. > > On the subject of contained documentation, I notice > > *** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgmlMon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002 > --- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Thu May 10 21:46:33 2001 > *** > *** 3,7 > documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. > --> > > ! > ! > --- 3,7 > documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. > --> > > ! > ! > > Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand > the latter seems correct ... I wasn't sure what to do here. I figured if the docs were regenerated, it should say 7.2.1, and if they aren't, then they will stay as 7.2. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup.| Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marc G. Fournier writes: >> Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks >> clean, sizes all look right ... > ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3. On the subject of contained documentation, I notice *** postgresql-7.2.1/doc/src/sgml/version.sgml Mon Mar 18 18:04:11 2002 --- REL7_2/doc/src/sgml/version.sgmlThu May 10 21:46:33 2001 *** *** 3,7 documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. --> ! ! --- 3,7 documentation. In text, use for example &version; to refer to them. --> ! ! Is this right, or should "majorversion" still be 7.2? Right offhand the latter seems correct ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Marc G. Fournier writes: > Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks > clean, sizes all look right ... ... but the contained documentation is for 7.3. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] Rolling v7.2.1 ...
Try her out and let me know if there are any problems ... the build looks clean, sizes all look right ... if no visible probs, will announce in the mroning ... On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Just before anyone asks where it is ... I'm just rolling v7.2.1 up right > now and will let everyone know once its ready for a download ... I'll do > up an announce in the morning unless anyone finds a flaw in it ... > > > > > ---(end of broadcast)--- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
