Re: [HACKERS] Status Report on Hot Standby
Robert Treat wrote: On Friday 16 January 2009 19:16:42 Simon Riggs wrote: Bruce asked for 2 more weeks to get patches into shape for commit. Current patch v8e is attached here. Ready for commit? Up to you. My overall opinion is that it's in very good shape. Worth the community including it in this release and spending further time on it. I'm happy to stand by this going forwards. +1 +1 I've been testing several versions of this patch, and overall it looks very good. regards Mark -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Status Report on Hot Standby
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 18:08 -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > > The patch could benefit further from input from other various hackers, > > what couldn't? It's time to put this in a shared repository (of some > > kind) and make further changes to it in a controlled manner. > > > > Yep. I've now got this running on Linux and Solaris and testing so far has > looked good. I've also spoken to a couple other people who have built it and > run it, and everyone has been pretty happy. It'd certainly be nice to see > this get into the main source tree to make it easier for future testing. (For > example, one hurdle on Solaris, I had to get a different version of patch to > handle Simon's diff... ugh!) There'll be a new version out soon, hopefully tomorrow, with some fancy new deferred conflict resolution. Timing depends on passage through testing. I think it will then be fermented in GIT for a while. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Status Report on Hot Standby
On Friday 16 January 2009 19:16:42 Simon Riggs wrote: > Bruce asked for 2 more weeks to get patches into shape for commit. > > Current patch v8e is attached here. Ready for commit? Up to you. > > My overall opinion is that it's in very good shape. Worth the community > including it in this release and spending further time on it. I'm happy > to stand by this going forwards. > +1 > The patch could benefit further from input from other various hackers, > what couldn't? It's time to put this in a shared repository (of some > kind) and make further changes to it in a controlled manner. > Yep. I've now got this running on Linux and Solaris and testing so far has looked good. I've also spoken to a couple other people who have built it and run it, and everyone has been pretty happy. It'd certainly be nice to see this get into the main source tree to make it easier for future testing. (For example, one hurdle on Solaris, I had to get a different version of patch to handle Simon's diff... ugh!) -- Robert Treat Conjecture: http://www.xzilla.net Consulting: http://www.omniti.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
