Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 5:50 AM, David Steelewrote: > On 10/25/17 10:10 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: >> On 26 October 2017 at 02:50, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >>> >>> I would find interesting to add at the bottom of the backup_label file >>> a new field called "START TIMELINE: %d" to put this information in a >>> more understandable shape. Any opinions? >> >> Strong "yes" from me. > > +1 Thanks for the feedback. Attached is a patch to achieve so, I have added as well a STOP TIMELINE field in the backup history file. Note that START TIMELINE gets automatically into the backup history file. Added a CF entry as well. -- Michael backup_label_tli.patch Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
On 10/25/17 10:10 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: > On 26 October 2017 at 02:50, Michael Paquier> wrote: >> >> I would find interesting to add at the bottom of the backup_label file >> a new field called "START TIMELINE: %d" to put this information in a >> more understandable shape. Any opinions? > > Strong "yes" from me. +1 -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Timeline ID in backup_label file
On 26 October 2017 at 02:50, Michael Paquierwrote: > Hi all, > > Lately, in order to extract some information from a backup_label file > in python I have found myself doing something like the following to > get a timeline number (feel free to reuse that code, especially the > regex pattern): > pattern = re.compile('^START WAL > LOCATION:.*([0-9A-F]+\/[0-9A-F]+).*\(file ([0-9A-F]+)\)') > if pattern.match(backup_lable_line): > current_lsn = m.group(1) > current_segment = m.group(2) > current_tli = str(int(current_segment[:8], 16)) > > That's more or less similar to what read_backup_label()@xlog.c does > using sscanf(), still I keep wondering why we need to go through this > much complication to get the origin timeline number of a base backup, > information which is IMO as important as the start LSN when working on > backup methods. > > I would find interesting to add at the bottom of the backup_label file > a new field called "START TIMELINE: %d" to put this information in a > more understandable shape. Any opinions? Strong "yes" from me. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers