Re: [HACKERS] horology and DST changeover
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's time for the 6 monthly discussion of the failure of the horology tests during DST changeover. This will go away whenever we fix the interval datatype to distinguish '1 day' from '24 hours'. In the meantime, it reminds us of the work we need to do there ;-). I don't think you should do any heavy lifting to hide the error. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [HACKERS] horology and DST changeover
Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's time for the 6 monthly discussion of the failure of the horology tests during DST changeover. This will go away whenever we fix the interval datatype to distinguish '1 day' from '24 hours'. In the meantime, it reminds us of the work we need to do there ;-). I don't think you should do any heavy lifting to hide the error. Ok. I hope this happens before the next changeover, then. cheers andrew ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
