Re: [HACKERS] patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
Erik Rijkers wrote: > On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote: > > Hi Pavel, > > > > In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in > > polymorphic functions), > > where the function name is concat(): (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic > > SQL Functions). > > Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name > > when concat goes into > > core, as seems to be the plan. > > > > If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change > > that example > > function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied. > > > > My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached. > > Here is the correct one. Applied for 9.1. Thanks. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
Hello 2010/7/29 Erik Rijkers : > On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote: >> Hi Pavel, >> >> In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in >> polymorphic functions), >> where the function name is concat(): (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic >> SQL Functions). >> Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name >> when concat goes into >> core, as seems to be the plan. >> >> If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change >> that example >> function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied. >> > > My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached. > > Here is the correct one. > it is good idea, thank you Pavel > > Erik Rijkers > -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached )
On Thu, July 29, 2010 22:43, Erik Rijkers wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > In xfunc.sgml, I came across a function example (for use of VARIADIC in > polymorphic functions), > where the function name is concat(): (in the manual: 35.4.10. Polymorphic > SQL Functions). > Although that is not strictly wrong, it seems better to change that name when > concat goes into > core, as seems to be the plan. > > If you agree, it seems best to include this change in your patch and change > that example > function's name when the stringfunc patch gets applied. > My apologies, the previous email had the wrong doc-patch attached. Here is the correct one. Erik Rijkers xfunc.sgml.diff Description: Binary data -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
