Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
Added to TODO: * Rename /scripts directory because they are all C programs now --- Tom Lane wrote: > Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin? > > Nah, I don't like that. All the programs are at the same level in the > src/bin tree, and I think it should stay that way. > > Bruce's idea of calling it "tools" seems reasonable ... although there > might be some confusion because we also have a src/tools directory. > "admintools" seems a bit long to me, although I'd go along if other > people like it. Maybe just "admin"? > > regards, tom lane > -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 12:09, Jon Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore?
>
> I would've found it handy, but didn't know about it and wrote my own in
> Perl. Inside a transaction it drops the index then rebuilds it using what
> it gets from pg_get_indexdef(), and it looks at the index files on disk
> before and after to show disk space saved (or grown) per index and total.
> I run it weekly in cron.
>
> Is something like that of use to anyone else?
>
I think something like this was either posted to the list, put on gborg,
or maybe hidden in contrib somewhere. I'd like a copy if you don't mind,
I currently use reindex regularly on my database but your script sounds
a little more informational.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? > > I'd think it's still at least as useful as clusterdb. Why, are you > thinking of doing some work on it? No, I just noticed that it escaped the C conversion... Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? I would've found it handy, but didn't know about it and wrote my own in Perl. Inside a transaction it drops the index then rebuilds it using what it gets from pg_get_indexdef(), and it looks at the index files on disk before and after to show disk space saved (or grown) per index and total. I run it weekly in cron. Is something like that of use to anyone else? Jon ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? I'd think it's still at least as useful as clusterdb. Why, are you thinking of doing some work on it? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
> With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > that name seems very compelling either...) Does anyone care about contrib/reindexdb anymore? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin? Nah, I don't like that. All the programs are at the same level in the src/bin tree, and I think it should stay that way. Bruce's idea of calling it "tools" seems reasonable ... although there might be some confusion because we also have a src/tools directory. "admintools" seems a bit long to me, although I'd go along if other people like it. Maybe just "admin"? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 17:07, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > > that name seems very compelling either...) > > We could call it tools or admintools. How about just pulling them up a directory into src/bin? If they were complex, each would have a subdirectory in src/bin, so it seems reasonable to have individual files there. -- Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [HACKERS] src/bin/scripts seems a bit of a misnomer now
Tom Lane wrote: > With Peter's latest commit, there aren't any actual scripts left in > src/bin/scripts; only C programs. Does that bother anyone? I was > wondering about renaming to something like src/bin/misc. (Not that > that name seems very compelling either...) We could call it tools or admintools. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
