Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? resurrected the install and subscribed it to pgsql-hackers: http://trackerdemo.postgresql.org however it seems that it won't deal with patches that just have Content-Type: text/plain (like: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg02586.php) - seems not to hard to fix from a quick glance at the code however. Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Stefan Kaltenbrunner píše v čt 29. 01. 2009 v 18:29 +0100: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? note the pieces part of my mail :-) As far as I recall the patchworks install somehow collided with the reviewboard one so it was disabled because Zdenek was still actively using reviewboard. I don't use it at this moment. You can disable reviewboard if you want. Zdenek -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. I think it was Keystone; Marc set it up. Not at all. That was *ages* ago. This was recently, and I was part of setting it up myself... In fact we still have the jail running ... Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. I think it was Keystone; Marc set it up. Not at all. That was *ages* ago. This was recently, and I was part of setting it up myself... In fact we still have the jail running ... That's reviewboard AFAIK, or do we also have one with patchwork? Which one? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Magnus Hagander wrote: Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: On 29 jan 2009, at 05.35, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. I think it was Keystone; Marc set it up. Not at all. That was *ages* ago. This was recently, and I was part of setting it up myself... In fact we still have the jail running ... That's reviewboard AFAIK, or do we also have one with patchwork? Which one? well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Thursday 29 January 2009 11:40:48 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: well from a quick glance there is the bugzilla demo install as well as pieces of reviewboard and patchwork on the trackerdemo jail. So what's the URL and where can we sign up? note the pieces part of my mail :-) As far as I recall the patchworks install somehow collided with the reviewboard one so it was disabled because Zdenek was still actively using reviewboard. Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
All, Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 10:18 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote: All, Thing is, our review/commit process is so peculiar to our project that using *any* prebuilt solution would require us to change our process to support the tool. And I can't imagine this group doing that. I am not sure I agree with this. Someone submits patch ticket is created reviewer takes ticket comments submitter takes ticket fixes based on comments review takes ticket approves if reviewer is a committers, he commits. if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to need final review tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters. Sounds like standard stuff to me. Joshua D. Drake --Josh -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Josh, Someone submits patch ticket is created reviewer takes ticket comments submitter takes ticket fixes based on comments review takes ticket approves if reviewer is a committers, he commits. if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to need final review tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters. Sounds like standard stuff to me. But that's *not* actually how we do things. So you're making my point. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: But that's *not* actually how we do things. So you're making my point. Well, the stuff around the wiki status board is pretty new and I don't think anyone feels that it's set in stone yet. The thing we don't want to compromise on, IMHO, is that the long-term record of what's happened is in the mailing list archives and *not* in the internal state of some tool we happen to be using. (One obvious reason for not compromising on that is that we'd be locked into whatever tool we first pick.) But it doesn't really matter whether the tool thinks it has archival state, as long as we can make it link to the archives conveniently. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. I don't recall specifically :-( Which in itself might mean it's worthwhile to make another try. But i recall trying that one and reviewboard, and none of them was what we needed. If you look at Berkus' list of required features (if you haven't seen it, I'm sure he'll be happy to send you a copy), you will see that it doesn't come close. We can always argue if his list is reasonable :-), but that's just a fact. It has nothing about round-robin reviewers. It has no keep-track-of-nagging features. It has no integration with our mail archives. At least it didn't then - it also appears to have no online documentation, so I can't easily check now :-P //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Magnus Hagander a écrit : Peter Eisentraut wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. I don't recall specifically :-( Which in itself might mean it's worthwhile to make another try. But i recall trying that one and reviewboard, and none of them was what we needed. If you look at Berkus' list of required features (if you haven't seen it, I'm sure he'll be happy to send you a copy), Josh, can you please give the link to this list of feature ? you will see that it doesn't come close. We can always argue if his list is reasonable :-), but that's just a fact. It has nothing about round-robin reviewers. It has no keep-track-of-nagging features. It has no integration with our mail archives. At least it didn't then - it also appears to have no online documentation, so I can't easily check now :-P //Magnus - -- Cédric Villemain Administrateur de Base de Données Cel: +33 (0)6 74 15 56 53 http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmAOAMACgkQo/dppWjpEvxn6ACg2F5to39Q9fW9vvm25E9fW2Zl GAAAoOP9yMO3WuT5Rj98s7OyHhDYK4Ui =rP62 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: As for somewhere to host it, we certainly have some servers; not tons, but probably enough. Some of them even have Postgres running on it. We can certainly host an app under postgresql.org. The bigger issue will be speccing it to meet the requirements of the community without getting bogged down in bike shedding. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Dave Page wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: As for somewhere to host it, we certainly have some servers; not tons, but probably enough. Some of them even have Postgres running on it. We can certainly host an app under postgresql.org. The bigger issue will be speccing it to meet the requirements of the community without getting bogged down in bike shedding. I have started some very trivial work around this a while ago with the intent to get something simple up and working before too much bike shedding is done. I'll contact Robert off-list to discuss that. If somebody else - who actively works with what we have now!! - is interested in that discussion, let me know. Will obviously take it on-list before any decisions are made. So far I'm just talking about discussing a prototype. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On 1/27/09, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote: Robert Haas escribió: I think that it would probably be pretty easy to write a webapp to replace the CommitFest web page that basically did the same thing but with a bit more structure around it - with database tables like commitfest, patch, patch_version, patch_comment, and patch_review. I think I might even be willing to write such a webapp if someone would be willing to provide the infrastructure. The CommitFest web page was really useful this time around, but it's not conducive to any kind of automated pull. Hey, if you're willing to do it, we're certainly accepting proposals. The current wiki-based CommitFest is supposed to be just a stop-gap. It was started not only to support 8.4 development, but also as a test of the Commitfest idea itself. This has proven so successful that it's clear we should be going somewhere with it. As for somewhere to host it, we certainly have some servers; not tons, but probably enough. Some of them even have Postgres running on it. Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
I have started some very trivial work around this a while ago with the intent to get something simple up and working before too much bike shedding is done. I'll contact Robert off-list to discuss that. If somebody else - who actively works with what we have now!! - is interested in that discussion, let me know. Will obviously take it on-list before any decisions are made. So far I'm just talking about discussing a prototype. Sounds good. I think we will have the best chance of success if we keep it real simple. I don't want this to turn into a propaganda war about using everyone's favorite tool. I just want to write down a database schema that mimics the organization of the existing wiki page, put a thin web interface around it, and call it a day. It will take longer to analyze whether some other tool is sufficiently close to that than it will to write a tool that is exactly that. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: I have started some very trivial work around this a while ago with the intent to get something simple up and working before too much bike shedding is done. I'll contact Robert off-list to discuss that. If somebody else - who actively works with what we have now!! - is interested in that discussion, let me know. I'm very interested in that discussion. I don't know whether I am actively working with what we have now, but that's because since I wrote the original template structure, it hasn't changed a whole lot. Most of the tweaking has had to do with presentation, and massaging mediawiki to do what we wanted. As Alvaro points out, the wiki approach was intended to provide a stop-gap solution to patch tracking, and also to help us identify what we actually needed from a patch tracker, so that we could make a sensible decision about which tool to use when we did eventually move forward. Will obviously take it on-list before any decisions are made. So far I'm just talking about discussing a prototype. Sounds good. I think we will have the best chance of success if we keep it real simple. I don't want this to turn into a propaganda war about using everyone's favorite tool. I just want to write down a database schema that mimics the organization of the existing wiki page, put a thin web interface around it, and call it a day. It will take longer to analyze whether some other tool is sufficiently close to that than it will to write a tool that is exactly that. I can understand the desire to avoid a propaganda war. These discussions have borne little fruit previously, in part because we haven't had a clear idea of what was actually required from the tool. I think the picture has started to become more clear during the 8.4 dev cycle. Most importantly, there was much ado made about the need for powerful email integration features in previous discussions. This severely restricted our choices (possibly to zero?). I feel that the commitfest wiki has demonstrated that no such integration is required. Everyone wants to keep on using the mailing list for discussion, but we need somewhere else to keep track of patches and their status. To my knowledge, authors have been happy to add patches to the wiki and reviewers have been happy to update their status with no email integration whatsoever. We've continued to discuss things on the lists, while updating the wiki as required. If we forget about trying to integrate with email, the field opens right up and we can use pretty much any just-install-the-package tracking software out there and it will get the job done. For the sake of not advocating my favourite tool, I won't name any particular software, but I can think of several off the top of my head that could mirror the structure we currently have on the wiki without stretching. I think it's possible to skip the roll our own step in all of this and just move on to using a ready-made solution. In reality our requirements are very simple. Writing a low-fi version of the wiki would be pretty easy, but just dropping the patch data we already have into a patch tracker would be even easier. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
I think it's possible to skip the roll our own step in all of this and just move on to using a ready-made solution. In reality our requirements are very simple. Writing a low-fi version of the wiki would be pretty easy, but just dropping the patch data we already have into a patch tracker would be even easier. Well, if you're volunteering to set something up... great. We'll take a look at it when you have it working. That's not what I'm volunteering to do, though. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com writes: I think the picture has started to become more clear during the 8.4 dev cycle. Most importantly, there was much ado made about the need for powerful email integration features in previous discussions. This severely restricted our choices (possibly to zero?). I feel that the commitfest wiki has demonstrated that no such integration is required. Hardly --- one of the most critical usability fixes for the wiki was to make it relatively painless to insert links to the mail list archives (even for messages that hadn't made it there yet!). We're still gonna need that. I agree that we found out that we don't need to be able to send mail directly to the patch tracker, although perhaps cc'ing it would be a nice way to get such links installed. The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have (I haven't felt a need for it, but other people might be using that). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Notifying everyone who's updated the page isn't terribly useful. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Tom, Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? Notifies you when anyone makes any change of any kind to *any* patch (or piece of text, for that matter) in the commitfest. Including something like changing the number of patches assigned to an RRR. My inability to systematically send reminder e-mails to submitters and reviewers -- or for that matter, even track when they were assigned or last updated -- has been a significant drag on the effectiveness of the commitfests. Some patches stalled, and I missed them. --Josh -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? Notifies you when anyone makes any change of any kind to *any* patch (or piece of text, for that matter) in the commitfest. Including something like changing the number of patches assigned to an RRR. Okay, so it does have notification ability and you do want that, you just want it on a different granularity level. My inability to systematically send reminder e-mails to submitters and reviewers -- or for that matter, even track when they were assigned or last updated -- has been a significant drag on the effectiveness of the commitfests. Some patches stalled, and I missed them. Agreed, that would be helpful, and the wiki doesn't help you with it. So we want a patch tracker that can do that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Tom Lane escribió: Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com writes: Tom, The other thing that is commonly thought of as email integration is the ability to generate notification email, which AFAIK the wiki does have Um, no. It doesn't, and really can't. Oh. What's that watch this page option do, then? It allows you to click on a special watched pages link, which then lists the last few revisions for each of them. So it has two problems -- one is the wrong granularity level, and the other is that it's pull rather than push. -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: [HACKERS] 8.4 release planning)
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 23:59:46 Magnus Hagander wrote: Marko Kreen wrote: On 1/27/09, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday 27 January 2009 15:51:02 Marko Kreen wrote: Such app already exists: http://ozlabs.org/~jk/projects/patchwork/ So it's a matter of just setting it up. I was in fact in the process of setting that up just now. :-) Nice to know. :) I feel that even if we decide to do our own solution it would be good to try existing solution first. IIRC, we already installed and tried this a while ago. I don't remember exactly what it failed on, but there was something pretty clear. But maybe it's been fixed by now. Details? I find no public record of this. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
