Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 10:43:53PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 04:42:13AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 12:19:07PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:32:11PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:

[15 bit for three upcase ASCII]

> I feel silly for even mentioning this, but there are less than 256
> countries in the UN, and as far as I know, each has at most one
> currency, so you could use 8 bits instead of 15.

Hm. But then you'd have to cope with a mapping (currency-id ->
description) which changes over time. Maybe it'd suffice to postulate
that "no id be reused".

> > That leaves forty-eightish bits for the number or about 10^14.
> 
> By the above calculation, 56 bits or about 7.2 * 10^16.

Yes, way more useful than 10^14 (about a hundred times ;)

> It's not just dependent on time.  Exchange rates vary in such a way
> that the relationships are not always transitive :P

:-)

Regards
- -- tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFHilyBcgs9XrR2kYRAg+mAJ96+TTAjqEJK7J1nbI7EwVibYFoxwCfWElO
VJCskdQThqxI90gzTX+gR8A=
=OCN0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] Backup and restore through JDBC

2006-09-30 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Tom,

Tom Dunstan wrote:

>> On a unix box, when you're really crazy, and want to ignore all security
>> restrictions, you could even install pg_dump via inetd, and then
>> everyone connecting via TCP on the appropriate port gets a dump of the
>> database. :-)
> 
> Oh, man, my head just exploded reading that. That's taking evil and
> being *creative* with it. :)

Well, combine that with some firewall / hosts.allow rules, and sslwrap
with certificate based 2-way authentication, if you "insist" on
security. :-)

Keep on lauging,
Markus
-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread Xiaofeng Zhao

I feel silly for even mentioning this, but there are less than 256
countries in the UN, and as far as I know, each has at most one
currency, so you could use 8 bits instead of 15.

That's not always true, e.g. China has RMB and HKD.  Also Taiwan is not a 
member country of UN but I don't think one would exclude TWD.


There'll also times a country may transit from one currency to another. 
Even a currency (currency of most continental European countries before 
Euro) is no more being used, it may still need to be supported.


xz 



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread David Fetter
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 11:36:04AM -0400, Xiaofeng Zhao wrote:
> >I feel silly for even mentioning this, but there are less than 256
> >countries in the UN, and as far as I know, each has at most one
> >currency, so you could use 8 bits instead of 15.
> >
> That's not always true, e.g. China has RMB and HKD.  Also Taiwan is
> not a member country of UN but I don't think one would exclude TWD.

Right.  There are several countries whose currency is USD, so I still
contend that at any given instant, there are fewer than 256
currencies, so we're back to 8 bits.

> There'll also times a country may transit from one currency to
> another.  Even a currency (currency of most continental European
> countries before Euro) is no more being used, it may still need to
> be supported.

The "money" type is far too simplistic to model this kind of thing.  A
really sophisticated representation of money would have to take time,
inflation/deflation, pairwise exchange rates, etc. into account.  It
would look more like a schema with a large data set and a large body
of code loaded into it than it would a data type.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778AIM: dfetter666
  Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The "money" type is far too simplistic to model this kind of thing.  A
> really sophisticated representation of money would have to take time,
> inflation/deflation, pairwise exchange rates, etc. into account.  It
> would look more like a schema with a large data set and a large body
> of code loaded into it than it would a data type.

I don't think that's the appropriate functionality for a data type.
I used to be in the currency trading game (before I decided hacking
Postgres was more fun), and if you ask me, the people who want this
functionality are specifically interested in those exchange rates and
time variations --- it's exactly the purpose of their databases to
store, search, and manipulate that data, so burying it behind the scenes
in a datatype is exactly the wrong approach.

At least for what I was doing back then, a tagged type is exactly the
right thing: all we'd have wanted is for it to keep us from thinking
that adding 2 USD and 2 EUR directly was a sane computation.

Oh BTW: 10^14 is not enough dynamic range --- those guys push around
*serious* amounts of money.  Bill Gates' net wealth is somewhere north
of 10^13 cents, and he's just a private citizen not a bank.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>   When loading a rather large data set I started getting errors along
>   these lines:
> psql:/home/sfrost/school/cs750/reality/dump-anonymized.postgres.sql:262:
> WARNING:  nonstandard use of escape in a string literal
> LINE 1: ...XX ,9:9:999'),(9,'',0,'X XXX...
>  ^
> HINT:  Use the escape string syntax for escapes, e.g., E'\r\n'.

>   Which, by themselves, aren't really an issue *except* for the fact
>   that I got an *insane* number of them.  I don't think it was quite one
>   for every row (of which there were 20,795, you'll note) but it was
>   more than enough to drive me insane.  Additionally, cancel requests
>   were ignored.

That's not too surprising because I don't believe there are any
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls in the basic lex/parse loop.  That wouldn't
normally be a problem because that phase is pretty quick, but it is a
problem if the system is spitting tons of messages at you.

It seems like a reasonable thing to do would be to add a
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in elog.c just after sending a notice/warning
message to the client.

Comments?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Claudio Natoli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Magnus Hagander writes:
>> Now, I still twist my head around the lines:
>> if ((fd = _open_osfhandle((long) h, fileFlags & O_APPEND)) < 0
>> ||
>> (fileFlags & (O_TEXT | O_BINARY) && (_setmode(fd,
>> fileFlags & (O_TEXT | O_BINARY)) < 0)))

> Without having studied it closely, it might also highlight a bug on failure 
> of the second clause -- if the _setmode fails, shouldn't _close be called 
> instead of CloseHandle, and -1 returned?  (CloseHandle would still be called 
> on failure of the _open_osfhandle, obviously)

I agree that this code is both wrong and unreadable (although in
practice the _setmode will probably never fail, which is why our
attention hasn't been drawn to it).  Is someone going to submit a
patch?  I'm hesitant to change the code myself since I'm not in
a position to test it.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Hello,

It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD


t -lpgport -L../../../src/interfaces/libpq -lpq -L../../../src/port
-Wl,-rpath,'/usr/local/pgsql/lib' -lpgport -lz -lcrypt -ldl -lm  -o psql
input.o: In function `pg_send_history':
input.c:(.text+0x10d): undefined reference to `add_history'
input.o: In function `gets_interactive':
input.c:(.text+0x23d): undefined reference to `readline'
input.o: In function `initializeInput':
input.c:(.text+0x27a): undefined reference to `initialize_readline'
input.c:(.text+0x286): undefined reference to `using_history'
input.c:(.text+0x2ca): undefined reference to `read_history'
input.c:(.text+0x2d1): undefined reference to `history_set_pos'
input.c:(.text+0x2d6): undefined reference to `current_history'
input.c:(.text+0x311): undefined reference to `next_history'
input.o: In function `saveHistory':
input.c:(.text+0x409): undefined reference to `write_history'
input.c:(.text+0x43b): undefined reference to `history_set_pos'
input.c:(.text+0x440): undefined reference to `current_history'
input.c:(.text+0x481): undefined reference to `next_history'
input.o: In function `finishInput':
input.c:(.text+0x4df): undefined reference to `stifle_history'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [psql] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/jd/pgsql/src/bin/psql'
make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/jd/pgsql/src/bin'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jd/pgsql/src'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Configured with:

 ./configure --with-libedit-preferred --without-readline


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
 http://www.commandprompt.com/



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] adminpack

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is adminpack...

Applied with minor corrections (the .sql file is DATA not DATA_built,
as you'd have found out if you'd tried "make clean").  Likewise for
the pgrowlocks script.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] adminpack

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Here is adminpack...
> 
> Applied with minor corrections (the .sql file is DATA not DATA_built,
> as you'd have found out if you'd tried "make clean").  Likewise for
> the pgrowlocks script.

Noted, thanks.

> 
>   regards, tom lane
> 


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
 http://www.commandprompt.com/



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES

2006-09-30 Thread Luke Lonergan
That seems right, there won't be a performance impact unless the warnings are 
issued.

- Luke

Msg is shrt cuz m on ma treo

 -Original Message-
From:   Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Saturday, September 30, 2006 01:48 PM Eastern Standard Time
To: Stephen Frost
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject:Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES

Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>   When loading a rather large data set I started getting errors along
>   these lines:
> psql:/home/sfrost/school/cs750/reality/dump-anonymized.postgres.sql:262:
> WARNING:  nonstandard use of escape in a string literal
> LINE 1: ...XX ,9:9:999'),(9,'',0,'X XXX...
>  ^
> HINT:  Use the escape string syntax for escapes, e.g., E'\r\n'.

>   Which, by themselves, aren't really an issue *except* for the fact
>   that I got an *insane* number of them.  I don't think it was quite one
>   for every row (of which there were 20,795, you'll note) but it was
>   more than enough to drive me insane.  Additionally, cancel requests
>   were ignored.

That's not too surprising because I don't believe there are any
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls in the basic lex/parse loop.  That wouldn't
normally be a problem because that phase is pretty quick, but it is a
problem if the system is spitting tons of messages at you.

It seems like a reasonable thing to do would be to add a
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in elog.c just after sending a notice/warning
message to the client.

Comments?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread Xiaofeng Zhao

There'll also times a country may transit from one currency to
another.  Even a currency (currency of most continental European
countries before Euro) is no more being used, it may still need to
be supported.


The "money" type is far too simplistic to model this kind of thing.  A
really sophisticated representation of money would have to take time,
inflation/deflation, pairwise exchange rates, etc. into account.  It
would look more like a schema with a large data set and a large body
of code loaded into it than it would a data type.


The statement of my bank account does not contain any of the quantities you 
mentioned.  But when some body open a statement from year 2000, most likely 
he expect to see the balance and transcations are in, say, German Marks, not 
in Euros.


xz


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
  choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
  match


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD

On what platform, and with what version of libedit?  I built HEAD just
yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.

> Configured with:
>  ./configure --with-libedit-preferred --without-readline

Not sure that combination of switches is sensible.  Try it with
just the first, or even without either if you don't have readline
present.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[HACKERS] Select for update with outer join broken?

2006-09-30 Thread Josh Berkus
All,

Some change which was made in the last couple weeks broke select for update 
with an outer join:

Please examine the SQLException for more information.
NestedException: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: SELECT FOR  
UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join
         at  
com.sun.jdo.spi.persistence.support.sqlstore.SQLStoreManager.throwJDOSql 
Exception(SQLStoreManager.java:632)

This was working per SQL spec before beta ... what happened?  Error above is 
from Thursday's snapshot.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD
> 
> On what platform, and with what version of libedit?  I built HEAD just
> yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.

we have (a bit of) buildfarm coverage of that too - at least emu is
building with --with-libedit-preferred for a while now.

> 
>> Configured with:
>>  ./configure --with-libedit-preferred --without-readline
> 
> Not sure that combination of switches is sensible.  Try it with
> just the first, or even without either if you don't have readline
> present.

I agree - using both flags together looks just wrong ...


Stefan

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
   subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
   message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [HACKERS] Select for update with outer join broken?

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus  writes:
> Some change which was made in the last couple weeks broke select for update 
> with an outer join:

> NestedException: org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: ERROR: SELECT FOR 
> UPDATE/SHARE cannot be applied to the nullable side of an outer join

What SQL query is it complaining about, exactly?  That error message has
been there right along, but I seem to recall having moved the place
where it's checked for since 8.1.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD
> > 
> > On what platform, and with what version of libedit?  I built HEAD just
> > yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.
> 
> we have (a bit of) buildfarm coverage of that too - at least emu is
> building with --with-libedit-preferred for a while now.
> 
> > 
> >> Configured with:
> >>  ./configure --with-libedit-preferred --without-readline
> > 
> > Not sure that combination of switches is sensible.  Try it with
> > just the first, or even without either if you don't have readline
> > present.
> 
> I agree - using both flags together looks just wrong ...

I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you
certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable
it.  I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the
line-editing capability off in general rather than just readline, which
is confusing.

-- 
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you
> certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable
> it.  I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the
> line-editing capability off in general rather than just readline, which
> is confusing.

The documentation could be improved perhaps:

$ ./configure --help | grep -i edit
  --with-libedit-preferred  prefer BSD Libedit over GNU Readline
  --without-readline  do not use GNU Readline / BSD Libedit line editing
$

ISTM the second line would be clearer if it read

  --without-readline  do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit for editing

Also, we probably ought to see if we can make the libedit-preferred line
come out second.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


[HACKERS] Still need GUC update_process_title?

2006-09-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
We added GUC update_process_title (default is 'on') in 8.2 based on
tests Tom ran showing that there was a performance impact for the
process title.  With the new use of strlcpy(), is there still an impact
from process title?  Tom, would you run your tests again?  Thanks.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDBhttp://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It seems I am unable to compile libedit support in -HEAD
> 
> On what platform, and with what version of libedit?  I built HEAD just
> yesterday on a vanilla Darwin/Intel 10.4.7 machine with Apple's libedit.
> 
>> Configured with:
>>  ./configure --with-libedit-preferred --without-readline
> 
> Not sure that combination of switches is sensible.  Try it with
> just the first, or even without either if you don't have readline
> present.

I will give it a shot *but* I would suggest we change the wording:

 --with-libedit-preferred  prefer BSD Libedit over GNU Readline


That says to me, try libedit but if it doesn't work, try readline.

But maybe that is just me.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
>   regards, tom lane
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> 


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
 http://www.commandprompt.com/



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] libedit broke in head

2006-09-30 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I think the switches are confusing ... when you are using libedit, you
>> certainly don't want readline as well, so it seems natural to disable
>> it.  I understand that what --without-readline really does is turn the
>> line-editing capability off in general rather than just readline, which
>> is confusing.

Just to verify. With removing the second switch, were good. It tested
and ran clean.

> 
> The documentation could be improved perhaps:
> 
> $ ./configure --help | grep -i edit
>   --with-libedit-preferred  prefer BSD Libedit over GNU Readline
>   --without-readline  do not use GNU Readline / BSD Libedit line editing
> $
> 
> ISTM the second line would be clearer if it read
> 
>   --without-readline  do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit for editing
> 
> Also, we probably ought to see if we can make the libedit-preferred line
> come out second.

I really don't get the libedit-preferred syntax? Why not just:

--with-libedit  use BSD Libedit not GNU Readline
--with-readline use GNU Readline not BSD Libedit
--without-readline do not use GNU Readline nor BSD Libedit

Of course --without-readline is really a misnomer too. But
--without-edit doesn't sound right.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



> 
>   regards, tom lane
> 


-- 

   === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
   Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
 http://www.commandprompt.com/



---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

   http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


Re: [HACKERS] New version of money type

2006-09-30 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 01:00:05PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Oh BTW: 10^14 is not enough dynamic range --- those guys push around
> *serious* amounts of money.  Bill Gates' net wealth is somewhere north
> of 10^13 cents, and he's just a private citizen not a bank.

I do agree that a range in the 10^14 is too small. Even 10^16 seems to
be uncomfortably near to existing values. And thensome like to do things
with (decimal) sub-cent accuracy (think percents and prices per weight
unit). May be 64 bit is just not enough for a tagged money type?

Regards
- -- tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFH0cDBcgs9XrR2kYRAhBfAJ9xvi1z8N73VpoiPSczZCUgBENKrgCdHGOd
fEY52y+um4jgW1oUkb8YQ64=
=0UGx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
   choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
   match


Re: [HACKERS] Still need GUC update_process_title?

2006-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We added GUC update_process_title (default is 'on') in 8.2 based on
> tests Tom ran showing that there was a performance impact for the
> process title.  With the new use of strlcpy(), is there still an impact
> from process title?  Tom, would you run your tests again?  Thanks.

I don't really need to: the platforms on which it counts are the ones
where a kernel call is involved.  It's sheer folly to suppose that
strlcpy eliminates that issue.

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend