-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:46:15 -0500 Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would suggest forgetting that part and submitting the part > > > that has some chance of getting accepted. > > > > > > Actually i want to submit the patch, which is best according to me. > > You do need to be able to be able to feel that your work is up to a standard that you find redeemable. However... > That's not an attitude that is likely to succeed - you need to take > suggestions from Tom very seriously. Andrew is absolutely correct here. If you do not agree with Tom, you best prove why. Otherwise your patch will likely be ignored on submission. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake - -- The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHaWj9ATb/zqfZUUQRAqsNAJ9k6p0z7rQEcqal0JoKw/ZZG8h5kACfaB9y xQJ4O+h1xe947O1gnTLEbTU= =WaSW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
