Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Josh Berkus
Bruce,

 Patch applied.  Thanks.

Great.  'cause I need to patch the patch, due to a cut-and-paste error.  Next 
patch coming Friday, much less extensive than this one.

Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming?   Is there docs for it?

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Is the HAS_RENDEZVOUS GUC still coming?   Is there docs for it?

Don't worry about it.  If it gets added, it will be the adder's
responsibility to update the docs too.

(But if you are not happy with the current state of runtime.sgml,
we need fixes for that ASAP.)

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom,

 It should be removed from runtime.sgml then.
 
 Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
 SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
 although it was removed during 7.4 development.  Could we have that
 out of there in the next patch?

Will do.  Is SHOW_BTREE gone, or is it just a Source Developer Option?

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
 SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
 although it was removed during 7.4 development.  Could we have that
 out of there in the next patch?

 Will do.  Is SHOW_BTREE gone, or is it just a Source Developer Option?

It's gone.  You might want to crosscheck the docs against the CVS-tip
version of guc.c ...

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-25 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom,

 Also, one of the Red Hat guys pointed out to me that
 SHOW_BTREE_BUILD_STATS seems to have crept back into runtime.sgml,
 although it was removed during 7.4 development.  Could we have that
 out of there in the next patch?

Accoring to GUC.c this morning, the option is still there ... it's just been 
re-named to LOG_BTREE_BUILD_STATS.   Is this a mistake in GUC.c, or should 
I put it back in Runtime.SGML under the new name?

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [PATCHES] Runtime.SGML diff ... please expedite!

2003-06-24 Thread Bruce Momjian

Patch applied.  Thanks.

---


Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
 This is the other portion he is referring to.
 
 client-auth.sgml references a renamed ID in runtime.sgml
 
 On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 16:46, Tom Lane wrote:
  Josh Berkus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   Attached is the fully corrected version of the re-ording patch for=20
   Runtime.sgml and dependant files.
  
  Dependent files?  I only see a diff for runtime.sgml there ...
  
  regards, tom lane
  
  ---(end of broadcast)---
  TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match
 -- 
 Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

[ Attachment, skipping... ]
-- End of PGP section, PGP failed!

-- 
  Bruce Momjian|  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive, |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.|  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]