[SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

2004-03-30 Thread Josh Berkus
Folks,

Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant commercial 
entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.Since I'm often foggy 
on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92 spec definitions of things, I 
thought I'd post it for feedback here:

1) SQL-92 SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE
2) SQL-92 CREATE/DROP SCHEMA/TABLE
3) SQL-92 INFORMATION_SCHEMA or SQL/CLI or ODBC driver with metadata functions
4) SQL-99 CREATE TRIGGER/DROP TRIGGER
5) SQL-99 BLOB, CLOB Data Types up to 1MB
6) SQL-99 Distinct Types 
7) SQL-99 Structured Types 
8) SQL-99 Functions, Methods, Procedures 
9) SQL-99 Collection Types
10) SQL-99 Typed tables and views
11) SQL-99 Recursion
12) SQL/CLI or ODBC driver supports asynchronous statement execution
13) SQL/CLI or ODBC driver Supports all required SQL features
14) Transaction management functionsâbegin transaction, commit, abort
15) Wire protocol documentation and software

My answers:

1) Yes
2) yes
3) Yes -- INFORMATION_SCHEMA
4) Yes, unless SQL99 has some wierd twist on triggers.
6), 7) Not sure what these are.
8) Functions, yes, and in PostgreSQL functions are capable of acting as 
procedures.   
9) ???
10) Also not sure
11) In development, expected within the next two versions.  Currently we have 
non-SQL-standard recursion by several methods.
12) No
13) Not sure.
14) Yes
15) I think so.

Feedback, please!

-- 
-Josh Berkus
 Aglio Database Solutions
 San Francisco


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

2004-03-30 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant commercial 
> entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.

This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
inquiry.  Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
need?  In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?

regards, tom lane

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

2004-03-30 Thread Josh Berkus
Tom,

> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry.  Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need?  In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?

I'll ask, but I'm not sure that I can.   The particular company is very 
bureaucratic, and I doubt the person who asked me has any control over the 
questionnaire.

-- 
-Josh Berkus

__AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___
Josh Berkus
   Complete information technology  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and data management solutions   (415) 565-7293
   for law firms, small businesses   fax 651-9224
and non-profit organizations.   San Francisco


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
  subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
  message can get through to the mailing list cleanly


[SQL] plpgsql vs. SQL in stored procedures

2004-03-30 Thread Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
Is there a way to declare variables and use IF in plain SQL, not in
plpgsql inside stored procedures?

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster