Re: [SQL] [pgsql-advocacy] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

[Peter Eisentraut]

Josh Berkus wrote:
> > 4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables
> > A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type
> > ST is called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a
> > typed table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and
> > declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC
> > that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the
> >
> > I really don't quite understand this, but I don't think we have it
> > ;-)
>
> Ye Gods and Little Fishes!!
>
> Was the SQL99 Committee smoking crack, or what?What the heck is
> that *for*?

Object/relational mapping?


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

[Peter Eisentraut]

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant
> commercial entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.   
> Since I'm often foggy on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92
> spec definitions of things, I thought I'd post it for feedback here:

The list of supported features can be found here: 
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/features.html


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings