[SQL] Aggregate Aggravation

2001-09-27 Thread Robin's PG-SQL List


I have a query using the SUM() function that is not returning the 
appropriate results.

There are 3 queries with results below.  Query 1 is the type of query I'd
like to use, that has the SUM() function and a join with a customer table
(bolcustomer) to constrain the results to a particular customer.  The
"sum" field ends up being 78 for this particular car.  Query 2 is the same
query without the customer table (bolcustomer) qualifier.  This qualifier
may seem superfluous in these test queries, but in real life the customer
constraint is necessary because the other ones (car number and arrival
date) are not present.  I had to add them to get a snapshot suitable for
testing and for this post.  As you can see, Query 2 returns the proper sum
of 64.  Query 3 and accompanying results illustrate why 64 is correct.
Furthermore, there were about 100 cars involved in the "real life"
application of this query, and only 2 cars produced the "inappropriate"
results (including the car in this example - BCOL730563) ... so 98% of the
time it appeared to work.  That's why I was wondering if the SUM()
function had something to do with the problem.

My question is somewhat open-ended: does anyone see anything fundamentally
wrong with Query 1?  I'd really like to use it or it's functional
equivalent if possible.  What is it about adding "inventorydebit" to the
"FROM" clause, "inventorydebit.bol_number = bolcustomer.bol_number" to the
"WHERE" clause, and "bolcustomer.customer_id" to the "GROUP BY" clause
that causes the query to return the sum of 78 instead of 64?

Thank you for reading my post.

Best,

-Robin



-- Query 1
--
SELECT
inventorydebit.car_number,
inventorydebit.arrival_date,
SUM(inventorydebit.debit_amount)
FROM
inventorydebit,
bolcustomer
WHERE
inventorydebit.bol_number = bolcustomer.bol_number
AND
inventorydebit.arrival_date = '25-Jun-2001'
AND
inventorydebit.car_number = 'BCOL730563'
AND
bolcustomer.customer_id = '105'
GROUP BY
inventorydebit.arrival_date,
inventorydebit.car_number;

car_number  |arrival_date|sum
++---
BCOL730563  |  06-25-2001| 78
(1 row)


-- Query 2
--
SELECT
   inventorydebit.car_number,
   inventorydebit.arrival_date,
   SUM(inventorydebit.debit_amount)
FROM
inventorydebit
WHERE
   inventorydebit.car_number = 'BCOL730563'
AND
inventorydebit.arrival_date = '25-Jun-2001'
GROUP BY
   inventorydebit.arrival_date,
   inventorydebit.car_number;

car_number  |arrival_date|sum
++---
BCOL730563  |  06-25-2001| 64
(1 row)


-- Query 3
--
SELECT
bol_number,
debit_amount
FROM
inventorydebit
WHERE
car_number = 'BCOL730563'
AND
arrival_date = '25-Jun-2001';

bol_number|debit_amount
--+
 88190|   2
 88503|  16
 88514|  16
 88595|  16
 88738|  14
(5 rows)


TABLES INVOLVED

pcireload=> \d inventory
Table= inventory
+--+-+---+
|  Field   |  Type   | Length|
+--+-+---+
| car_number   | char() not null |12 |
| arrival_date | date not null   | 4 |
| line_item_seq| int2 not null   | 2 |
| line_item_qty| int2| 2 |
| line_item_desc   | char()  |50 |
| pieces_per_unit  | int2| 2 |
| material_location| char()  |30 |
| inventory_user   | char()  |12 |
+--+-+---+
Index:inventory_pk

pcireload=> \d inventorydebit
Table= inventorydebit
+--+-+---+
|  Field   |  Type   | Length|
+--+-+---+
| bol_number   | int4 not null   | 4 |
| car_number   | char() not null |12 |
| arrival_date | date not null   | 4 |
| line_item_seq| int2 not null   | 2 |
| debit_amount | int2| 2 |
+--+-+---+
Index:inventorydebit_pk

pcireload=> \d bolcustomer
Table= bolcustomer
+--+-+---+
|  Field   |  Type   | Length|
+--+--

Re: [SQL] Aggregate Aggravation

2001-10-02 Thread Robin's PG-SQL List


Indeed I do.  I need to add another constraint on that query.  It
never would have occurred to me had I not asked.  Problem solved.  Thank
you, thank you!

-Robin

On Thu, 27 Sep 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Robin's PG-SQL List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have a query using the SUM() function that is not returning the 
> > appropriate results.
> 
> I'm guessing that you have two rows in bolcustomer matching
> bol_number = 88738, so that the 14 gets added in twice.
> 
>   regards, tom lane
> 
> ---(end of broadcast)---
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> 


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly