Re: [SQL] Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp

[christopher wood]

Thanks Markus,

But I can't even take credit for that, my business partner suggested using 
Postgres.


I have been a DB2 DBA most of my professional life (25 years) until 
recently, and a huge proponent of DB2 against the likes of Oracle and 
MS-SQL.


So far I am very impressed with Postgres but there is a lot more in Postgres 
to get one's head around.  I certainly appreciate having people like you and 
Andrew to help me along.


God Bless,
- chris



From: Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: chrisj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [SQL] Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:07:40 +0200

Hi, Chris,
Hi, Andrew,

Chrisj wrote:

> please be patient with me sometimes I am slow but I usually get there.


Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Sorry, I'm dim,

> Told you I'm dim.


That's just plain wrong. You guys are using PostgreSQL, and that's the
proof that you're the brightest people on the planet. :-)


HTH,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Re: [SQL] Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp

[christopher wood]

Hi Markus,

what is AFAICT ?

In the commercial space, I believe DB2 is one of the best



From: Markus Schaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: PostgreSQL SQL List 
To: pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
CC: christopher wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Assigning a timestamp without timezone to a timestamp
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:44:49 +0200

Hi, Christopher,

christopher wood wrote:

> But I can't even take credit for that, my business partner suggested
> using Postgres.

So I guess he's a smart one, too. :-)

At least as long as he understands that free software does not mean a
TCO of zero dollars, that's the main mistake when businesses try to jump
on the free software train.

> I have been a DB2 DBA most of my professional life (25 years) until
> recently, and a huge proponent of DB2 against the likes of Oracle and
> MS-SQL.

DB2 is not the worst one, AFAICT.

And as a long-time DBA, you know that administration of a real DBMS is
not "install and forget", but lots of fine-tuning and ongoing care.

> So far I am very impressed with Postgres but there is a lot more in
> Postgres to get one's head around.  I certainly appreciate having people
> like you and Andrew to help me along.

PostgreSQL is neither perfect, nor a one-fits-all solution. (Hey, that's
the reason for loads of individuals and companies to develop new
releases and extensions, after all. :-)

But it's a stable DBMS providing most features one would expect and use,
and it has a very supportive community, and commercial supporters and
niche-derivates.

As long as you want to keep learning, and don't hesitate getting
involved, PostgreSQL will offer you a satisfying experience.

Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org




---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

  http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq