Re: [Pharo-dev] Launcher and Pharo 6.1
EstebanLM wrote > it is safe. 6.1 Great. Thanks, guys. I downloaded a new vm via `curl get.pharo.org/vm61 | bash` and it seems to be working fine with 6.0 images. - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770p4958036.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-dev] Launcher and Pharo 6.1
Hi, Yes as Eliot said, it is safe. 6.1 just includes latest bug fixes from Eliot + a new version of libgit2 Esteban > On 30 Jul 2017, at 05:59, Eliot Mirandawrote: > > Hi Sean, > > >> On Jul 29, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Sean P. DeNigris wrote: >> >> Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? >> I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image? > > In general, Squeak/Pharo VMs are backwards compatible at least within a major > version. > >> - >> Cheers, >> Sean >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html >> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >
Re: [Pharo-dev] Launcher and Pharo 6.1
Hi Sean, > On Jul 29, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Sean P. DeNigriswrote: > > Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? > I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image? In general, Squeak/Pharo VMs are backwards compatible at least within a major version. > - > Cheers, > Sean > -- > View this message in context: > http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html > Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
[Pharo-dev] Launcher and Pharo 6.1
Is it safe to replace the Launcher VM with the one required for Pharo 6.1? I.e. is that VM backward compatible with a Pharo 6.0 image? - Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Launcher-and-Pharo-6-1-tp4957770.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.