Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? That's where the ConfigurationOf...'s and Metacello come in to ensure dependencies, versions and Smalltalk implementations. -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/SmalltalkHub-going-beta-in-a-week-tp3430480p3432602.html Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz a écrit : Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Hi Randal, You should blame me for that. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
.. and I see Metacello as a nice next step for SmalltalkHub: Metacello based projects can be regarded as: serious, maintained, trustful,.. in any case, those projects will be separated by itself from all other code. So we won't need to care much about those not much useful code in the repository... Janko On 07. 04. 2011 05:23, Dale Henrichs wrote: Randal, Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello was designed to do ... Dale On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Serge There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion -- Janko Mivšek Svetovalec za informatiko Eranova d.o.o. Ljubljana, Slovenija www.eranova.si tel: 01 514 22 55 faks: 01 514 22 56 gsm: 031 674 565
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Geert == Geert Claes geert.wl.cl...@gmail.com writes: Geert That's where the ConfigurationOf...'s and Metacello come in to ensure Geert dependencies, versions and Smalltalk implementations. I guess I'm thinking more of development. The question we were facing about Squeaksource (and don't yet know if this applies to SmalltalkHub) is how I as a developer keep my Squeak contributions separate from the same package being developed for Pharo for the packages that overlap but require different versions. Is there some way of tagging a Monticello package in SmalltalkHub as to which releases the development line is intended for? Note that I've just barely woken up, so if this sounds as confusing as it is to me right now, it probably is confused. :) -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:38 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. That is because there isn't an announcement yet. It only mentioned that a beta could be made available next week. I suppose that then an announcement will be made. -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
El mié, 06-04-2011 a las 19:48 -0700, Randal L. Schwartz escribió: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Serge There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? Isn't the responsibility of the repository. The repository only stores code. Just like svn or github. You can use other features to emulate and adapt it to your needs (like the tags) but that isn't a feature of the repo. Indeed is the task of the maintainer of the code to mark some versions as tested and ok on some versions of Squeak or Pharo. Currently, in Pharo, that job is done in Metacello configurations. Cheers -- Miguel Cobá http://twitter.com/MiguelCobaMtz http://miguel.leugim.com.mx
[Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- www.tudorgirba.com Being happy is a matter of choice.
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit : Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? There is nothing at the moment to migrate. I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton petton.nico...@gmail.comwrote: Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit : Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? There is nothing at the moment to migrate. I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. This is awesome. THanks ESUG! And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ? thanks Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com. Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and bothering the always helpful Bern phd students). Fernando On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton petton.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit : Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? There is nothing at the moment to migrate. I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. This is awesome. THanks ESUG! And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ? thanks Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
What we ask is: - scripting api so that we do not have to click click click click but write programs - tagging of projects - management of projects (admin I want to be able to tag projects with students and do not see them). - handling of ^%$$%*#^*^$$* long list of any items - in the future: a solid backend Basically we need scalability at the interface level. Now INRIA gracefully will offer a real back up of data (replicated in three different labs) and people will be able to use smalltalkhub and burn the machine processors :). Stef On Apr 6, 2011, at 2:15 PM, Fernando Olivero wrote: Excellent ! It's time to move past squeaksource.com. Would be nice to know the features that will be offered, at least in comparison with current squeaksource (besides the image crashing, and bothering the always helpful Bern phd students). Fernando On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck marianop...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Nicolas Petton petton.nico...@gmail.com wrote: Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 13:07 +0200, Tudor Girba a écrit : Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? There is nothing at the moment to migrate. I guess you'll just have to move your packages from squeaksource to smalltalkhub, so a simple script could do the trick. This is awesome. THanks ESUG! And the history? I mean, is this a new front end for a squeaksource server ? thanks Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- www.tudorgirba.com Being happy is a matter of choice.
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch wrote: Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... +1 But providing a tool/script so that we know how to migrate manually our own projects is a nice nice nice wish :) Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- www.tudorgirba.com Being happy is a matter of choice. -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote: Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that with some #archive tag or something. The same goes with code from other Smalltalks. Like Smalltalk Goodies archive back from 90's, there are quite some interesting code, which I'm still using. Best regards Janko Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you? On 6 avr. 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr Noury
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Hi, Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it. But, maybe there are practical reasons. In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes. Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 18:46, Janko Mivšek wrote: On 06. 04. 2011 18:34, Adrian Lienhard wrote: Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that with some #archive tag or something. The same goes with code from other Smalltalks. Like Smalltalk Goodies archive back from 90's, there are quite some interesting code, which I'm still using. Best regards Janko Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- Janko Mivšek Aida/Web Smalltalk Web Application Server http://www.aidaweb.si -- www.tudorgirba.com One cannot do more than one can do.
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
But you have the tool: Gofer :) Stef On Apr 6, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote: On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Adrian Lienhard a...@netstyle.ch wrote: Wow, looks great! I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... +1 But providing a tool/script so that we know how to migrate manually our own projects is a nice nice nice wish :) Cheers, Adrian On Apr 6, 2011, at 13:07 , Tudor Girba wrote: Phenomenal stuff :). I cannot wait to use it. Will there be a possibility to migrate the existing squeaksource there? Cheers, Doru On 6 Apr 2011, at 13:00, Nicolas Petton wrote: Hi, We've been working on a new code repository project management application for Smalltalk with ESUG named SmalltalkHub. If everything goes fine, the app should be in public beta in a week. The source code of SmalltalkHub will be available at the same moment (the project itself is hosted by SmalltalkHub). Here's a screenshot in the meantime. http://nicolas-petton.fr/2011/04/06/smalltalkhub-beta-in-a-week.html Cheers, Nicolas -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr -- www.tudorgirba.com Being happy is a matter of choice. -- Mariano http://marianopeck.wordpress.com
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Hi, Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it. But, maybe there are practical reasons. May be we could have a second server where we copy everything there. We will see how we will manage that. The query are important because we can identify created but unused created but dormant created but not used ... and tag them In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes. :) I did not guess on that one :) and with the new EyeSee we may expect to have some cool looking infrastructure.
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Le mercredi 06 avril 2011 à 20:30 +0200, Noury Bouraqadi a écrit : Cool! I guess you didn't you use JTalkST (too young), did you? No, it's too young to be used in real world apps. Maybe in the future ;) cheers, Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://www.nicolas-petton.fr
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Tudor Girba tudor.gi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Unless there is a scalability issue, I would not discard anything from squeaksource. I believe the evolution is too valuable to simply drop it. But, maybe there are practical reasons. In any case, the idea of having programatic access is really cool. I would love to use that for analysis purposes. Yes you are right, it might be difficult to say what is important and what is not. If you take the example of github and look at the explore dashboard here: https://github.com/explore you see only repositories with a lot of activities or the trendiest one. I guess there is also a lot of repositories non active or dormant on github also and nobody cares about that. You just need enough disk space ;-) Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Janko == Janko Mivšek janko.miv...@eranova.si writes: I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... Janko But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that Janko with some #archive tag or something. It's not like Squeaksource is going away any time soon. Remember, Pharo isn't the *only* Squeak out there. If the Pharo team wants to move off Squeaksource, that's great! We were already talking about how to tag various packages as squeak-only or pharo-only. This simplifies that. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Janko == Janko Mivšek janko.miv...@eranova.si writes: I think it's a good idea to *not* automatically migrate projects from SqueakSource ;). It's an opportunity to get rid of a lot of cruft that has accumulated on SqueakSource during the last years... Janko But still there can be something good and valuable. I'd migrate that Janko with some #archive tag or something. It's not like Squeaksource is going away any time soon. Remember, Pharo isn't the *only* Squeak out there. If the Pharo team wants to move off Squeaksource, that's great! We were already talking about how to tag various packages as squeak-only or pharo-only. This simplifies that. Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Regards. -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Nicolas forget about that i guess. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Serge There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Randal L. Schwartz mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Serge There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? At the code level, you can manage several Squeak/Pharo branchs with the help of Metacello. At the repository level, i dunno if this possible to use this kind of information for the web site. And i guess not every projects use (or want to use) Metacello, so suitable tags might be needed. There is no obligation for every communities or projects to be on SmalltalkHub, like every git repositories is not on github. Regards, -- Serge Stinckwich UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC), Hanoi, Vietnam Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk http://doesnotunderstand.org/
Re: [Pharo-project] SmalltalkHub going beta in a week
Randal, Managing packages on a per platform basis is one of the things that Metacello was designed to do ... Dale On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:48 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Randal L. Schwartz Serge mer...@stonehenge.com wrote: Serge == Serge Stinckwich serge.stinckw...@gmail.com writes: Serge Yes, but this SmalltalkHub not PharoHub ;-) Oh, did I miss the parallel announcement on squeak-dev? Sorry. Serge There was no announcement on squeak-dev. Serge Nicolas forget about that i guess. OK, so if this is a general replacement for Squeaksource, the tagging issue comes up again. How do we identify which branch of Squeak a package might be for? And can we maintain forks for those things that require it? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/ Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
