On 12/27/2015 01:50 PM, Johan Fabry wrote:
On Dec 27, 2015, at 15:18, Robert Withers <robert.w.with...@gmail.com
<mailto:robert.w.with...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Alright, I ask you all. Which meta-model is acceptable for practical
work in my stack? I need a meta-model to describe it, or rahter
anyone should be able to skin the meta-model they want and that makes
most sense. These consciousness meta-models, or meta-memes, from
religious tradition are well-defined models.
I have no opinion on this, this is a design question for your work,
and not straightforwardly related to Pharo itself. In my opinion and
apparently in the opinion of others as well, this is not a topic for
this mailing list. Sending multiple mails to the list about it can be
considered bad netiquette.
I find it very unfortunate you sidestepped my question with a claim of
not only no opinion, but that it has no place on this list. Intellectual
dishonesty is a rather poor maneuver for one who claims to be of an
enlightened tribe. I object on the basis of principle.
So, I would extend you another opportunity, which are valid meta-models?
Let's talk about meta-memes and meta-models within Pharo's creative
space. Shall it be the military analogy, then? How unfortunate, I'd wish
an alternative.
Regards,
--
Robert
. .. ... ^,^
