Re: [Pharo-users] Thanks All.

[Stephan Eggermont]

Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given 
the current options.


Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.


I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to 
trying out ideas.


Stephan

Re: [Pharo-users] Thanks All.

[Stephan Eggermont]

Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given 
the current options.


Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.


I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to 
trying out ideas.


Stephan

Re: [Pharo-users] Thanks All.

[Stephan Eggermont]

Op 26-12-2017 om 14:03 schreef Ian Ian:
After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given 
the current options.


Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.


I have always found the Gemstone people very approachable, and open to 
trying out ideas.


Stephan

[Pharo-users] Thanks All.

[Ian Ian]

After some looking into it I believe Mongo Voyager is the easiest given the
current options.

Too bad Gemstone limits usage after a given number of Gems.

Too bad ObjectDB does as well.

Thanks all. :)

On Dec 25, 2017 12:00 PM,  wrote:

> Send Pharo-users mailing list submissions to
> pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users_
> lists.pharo.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> pharo-users-requ...@lists.pharo.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> pharo-users-ow...@lists.pharo.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Pharo-users digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: Object Persistence (Hilaire)
>2. Re: Object Persistence (Joachim Tuchel)
>3. Re: Object Persistence (Torsten Bergmann)
>4. Re: Object Persistence (Stephane Ducasse)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Hilaire 
> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:08:08 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
> Fuel (present in the image) is nice, but not compatible from one image
> version to another one.
>
> Hilaire
>
>
> Le 25/12/2017 à 10:43, Ian Ian a écrit :
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
>>
>> :)
>>
>
> --
> Dr. Geo
> http://drgeo.eu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Joachim Tuchel 
> To: Any question about pharo is welcome 
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:54:10 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
> Wasn’t there an attempt to port Magma over from Squeak? That would sound
> like a nice alternative. Or Gemstone, of course.
>
> > Am 25.12.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Ian Ian :
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
> >
> > :)
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Torsten Bergmann 
> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
> Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome 
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 14:13:37 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
> Hi,
>
> with Voyage you can already use easy persistence in an OO way - with tiny
> (P)UnQlite up to Mongo.
>
> Check https://github.com/pharo-nosql
>
> Or you use Gemstone.
>
> For a full Magma version on Pharo:
> I doubt that will happen as Chris Muller was and still is more oriented
> towards Squeak as
> development platform. He is the author of Magma and beside the port it
> would cost him
> (or anyone who would do such a port) more effort to maintain another Pharo
> specific version.
>
> But maybe a Pharo client for a Squeak based Magma server is possible -
> with a Voyage wrapper.
>
> Bye
> T.
>
> > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Dezember 2017 um 12:54 Uhr
> > Von: "Joachim Tuchel" 
> > An: "Any question about pharo is welcome" 
> > Betreff: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
> >
> > Wasn’t there an attempt to port Magma over from Squeak? That would sound
> like a nice alternative. Or Gemstone, of course.
> >
> > > Am 25.12.2017 um 10:43 schrieb Ian Ian :
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
> > >
> > > :)
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Stephane Ducasse 
> To: Any question about pharo is welcome 
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:01:15 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Object Persistence
> the author of omnibase told me that he always wanted to port it to
> Pharo. But may be someone should do it.
> There is also VOSS that is open source even if GPL that could be
> ported to pharo but this is an effort too.
>
> Stef
>
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Ian Ian  wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thoughts of a purely OO nature?
> >
> > :)
>
>
>
> ___
> Pharo-users mailing list
> Pharo-users@lists.pharo.org
> http://lists.pharo.org/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users_lists.pharo.org
>
>