Re: [Phono-L] [OFF-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring
Definitely French Canadian. I have several friends who are French Canadian (Jean-Charles isn't one of them LOL). On Nov 10, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Steven Medved wrote: > French Canadian would be my guess. I Wrote an ebay seller once that was a > French Canadian and the English was the same. The Frenchmen I have written > to had excellent English. > >> From: kathal...@gmail.com >> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org >> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:44:49 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >> >>> From the wording, it looks like someone in Nigeria has hacked his email. >> >> >> >>> From the Desk of >> Kat Hall >> Executive Assistant to Ms. Smith (Publisher) >> Review Coordinator >> Author Liaison >> www.champagnebooks.com >> www.carnalpassions.com >> www.thewritersvineyard.com >> -Original Message- >> From: Jean-Charles Leblanc >> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:39 PM >> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >> >> >> i told you people whaht i had to tell you ,now dont get smart,what is my >> bunesse is not yours,and be calm AND I DONT WHANT ANY OF YOUR PRODUCT. >> >>> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org >>> From: john9...@pacbell.net >>> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:01:54 + >>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >>> >>> Jean-Charles- >>> Who are you trying to communicate with??? If you have a problem with a >>> seller on this board you need to take it up with them privately and off >>> the public list. >>> John Robles >>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Jean-Charles Leblanc >>> Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org >>> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:42:23 >>> To: >>> Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List >>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >>> >>> >>> hello,i made up my mind now that evry it clear,i guest i wont buy any of >>> your products,PS.dont send me any of dose gramophones i whont accept any >>> of them so every that is clear for you,forget about evrey thing once again >>> i dont whant to order any of your product. >>> From: ander...@tampabay.rr.com Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:07:27 -0500 To: phono-l@oldcrank.org Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring Folks, Again, This is what is required to make it work and what was originally supplied with the early style Edison Cygnet horn cranes. You dont need the spring as long as you have the older style crane. http://cgi.ebay.com/HORN-CONNECTOR-EDISON-COLUMBIA-CYLINDER-PHONOGRAPH-/320611493258?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4aa5ef258a Steve On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:57 PM, john9...@pacbell.net wrote: > WTF is that all about??? > John Robles > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Charles Leblanc > Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:51:17 > To: > Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > what do tou mein by no spring,that not new product,your suppose to > sell it complete,and what is the price you never told me your price i > am having trouble to get the price out of you people PS.and dose > gramophomes is not miniature,and before shipping any thing i whant to > be clear about everyting the price the shipping price and the > description of any items is that clear,your shipping nothing before my > autorisation is that clear. > >> From: steve_nor...@msn.com >> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org >> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:14:49 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >> >> >> People I know have one and it lifts up the reproducer one the one end >> of the record, on the other is it way too heavy on a fireside. My >> idea is to convert it to the new style. Thanks for the reply, I never >> gave this any thought until they had the problem. >> >>> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:11:36 -0800 >>> From: john9...@pacbell.net >>> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org >>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >>> >>> I would not think that they would track well, without the 'give' of >>> the spring. The rigid bolt connection seems as if it would be very >>> stiff. For those who are unfamiliar with this early horn, I have >>> posted a picture of the horn and crane and the suspension bolt at >>> this link: >>> http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa39/john9ten/Early%20Cygnet%20Horn/ >>> John Robles >>> >>> --- On Mon, 11/8/10, Steven Medved wrote: >>> >>> From: Steven Medved >>> Subject: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring >>> To: "phonolist" , "Phono-l" >>> >>> Date: Monday, November
Re: [Phono-L] [OFF-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring
French Canadian would be my guess. I Wrote an ebay seller once that was a French Canadian and the English was the same. The Frenchmen I have written to had excellent English. > From: kathal...@gmail.com > To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 20:44:49 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > >From the wording, it looks like someone in Nigeria has hacked his email. > > > > >From the Desk of > Kat Hall > Executive Assistant to Ms. Smith (Publisher) > Review Coordinator > Author Liaison > www.champagnebooks.com > www.carnalpassions.com > www.thewritersvineyard.com > -Original Message- > From: Jean-Charles Leblanc > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 8:39 PM > To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > i told you people whaht i had to tell you ,now dont get smart,what is my > bunesse is not yours,and be calm AND I DONT WHANT ANY OF YOUR PRODUCT. > > > To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > > From: john9...@pacbell.net > > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:01:54 + > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > > Jean-Charles- > > Who are you trying to communicate with??? If you have a problem with a > > seller on this board you need to take it up with them privately and off > > the public list. > > John Robles > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jean-Charles Leblanc > > Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org > > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 18:42:23 > > To: > > Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > > > > hello,i made up my mind now that evry it clear,i guest i wont buy any of > > your products,PS.dont send me any of dose gramophones i whont accept any > > of them so every that is clear for you,forget about evrey thing once again > > i dont whant to order any of your product. > > > > > From: ander...@tampabay.rr.com > > > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 14:07:27 -0500 > > > To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > > > > Folks, > > > Again, This is what is required to make it work and what was originally > > > supplied with the early style Edison Cygnet horn cranes. You dont need > > > the spring as long as you have the older style crane. > > > > > > http://cgi.ebay.com/HORN-CONNECTOR-EDISON-COLUMBIA-CYLINDER-PHONOGRAPH-/320611493258?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4aa5ef258a > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > On Nov 9, 2010, at 12:57 PM, john9...@pacbell.net wrote: > > > > > > > WTF is that all about??? > > > > John Robles > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: Jean-Charles Leblanc > > > > Sender: phono-l-boun...@oldcrank.org > > > > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:51:17 > > > > To: > > > > Reply-To: Antique Phonograph List > > > > Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > > > > > > > > > > what do tou mein by no spring,that not new product,your suppose to > > > > sell it complete,and what is the price you never told me your price i > > > > am having trouble to get the price out of you people PS.and dose > > > > gramophomes is not miniature,and before shipping any thing i whant to > > > > be clear about everyting the price the shipping price and the > > > > description of any items is that clear,your shipping nothing before my > > > > autorisation is that clear. > > > > > > > >> From: steve_nor...@msn.com > > > >> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > > > >> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:14:49 -0500 > > > >> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> People I know have one and it lifts up the reproducer one the one end > > > >> of the record, on the other is it way too heavy on a fireside. My > > > >> idea is to convert it to the new style. Thanks for the reply, I never > > > >> gave this any thought until they had the problem. > > > >> > > > >>> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:11:36 -0800 > > > >>> From: john9...@pacbell.net > > > >>> To: phono-l@oldcrank.org > > > >>> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > >>> > > > >>> I would not think that they would track well, without the 'give' of > > > >>> the spring. The rigid bolt connection seems as if it would be very > > > >>> stiff. For those who are unfamiliar with this early horn, I have > > > >>> posted a picture of the horn and crane and the suspension bolt at > > > >>> this link: > > > >>> http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa39/john9ten/Early%20Cygnet%20Horn/ > > > >>> John Robles > > > >>> > > > >>> --- On Mon, 11/8/10, Steven Medved wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> From: Steven Medved > > > >>> Subject: [Phono-L] Early cygnet horn without the spring > > > >>> To: "phonolist" , "Phono-l" > > > >>> > > > >>> Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 6:08 PM > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello, > > > >>> > > > >>> Does anyone have an early c
