Re: [Phono-L] restored or not
No wonder it was cranky! ;-) Loran On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Thomas Edison wrote: > it had not layes in sixty years. ___ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
[Phono-L] restored or not
It depends, If a machine is original and in exellent condition, leave it alone cosmetically, although the works should be cleaned, and adjusted. I had an amberola x in the other day, and cleaned the works and put it back together the belt was original and good shape, it worked great two hours of work, the cusotomers. Came back shoked, it had not layes in sixty years. ___ Phono-L mailing list http://phono-l.oldcrank.org
