ID:               35142
 User updated by:  matt dot jones at plumgroup dot com
 Reported By:      matt dot jones at plumgroup dot com
 Status:           Closed
 Bug Type:         SOAP related
 Operating System: *
 PHP Version:      5CVS-2005-11-07 (snap)
 Assigned To:      dmitry
 New Comment:

Thanks, this works perfectly!  Just a heads up to people using this
patch though:

You must clear out your WSDL cache for the patch to override the
previous incorrect behavior.


Previous Comments:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-11-08 09:37:05] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in CVS HEAD and PHP_5_1.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-11-08 00:54:42] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Assigned to the maintainer of ext/soap

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-11-08 00:07:02] matt dot jones at plumgroup dot com

I have tested this with php5-win32-latest.zip (it was easier than
recompiling for linux) and I am seeing the exact same behavior. 
Providing an array of objects is not interpreted properly and having
more than one subtag object results in the first tag to appear in the
WSDL being the only response.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-11-07 21:39:17] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please try using this CVS snapshot:

  http://snaps.php.net/php5-latest.tar.gz
 
For Windows:
 
  http://snaps.php.net/win32/php5-win32-latest.zip



------------------------------------------------------------------------

[2005-11-07 18:47:26] matt dot jones at plumgroup dot com

Description:
------------
When implementing a function to handle a soap request in a SoapServer
the object that is returned has a specific and obvious structure.  It
is an object with basic typed members to represent the attributes and
one or more complex objects (or an array of objects) for subtags which
are built as a similar sort of object.

What I am proposing would be to allow for this same complex object
structure to be passed in and parsed by both the
SoapClient->{function()} and to be returned by the functions specified
to handle the soap request for the SoapServer.

Reproduce code:
---------------
The following is some partial source code that represents how I would
like to see objects supported in the client-side:

http://roberts.plumgroup.com/~mjones/soapclient.txt

You can see that there are multiple classes created to contruct the
request.  The code makes use of both single objects and arrays of
objects to create a complex request.  You can find a version of the
WSDL that this is partially implementing here:

http://roberts.plumgroup.com/~mjones/test.wsdl

Expected result:
----------------
The system should be able to accept this format for incoming objects to
properly create a complex soap request such as:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:ns1="http://testurl/Message";>
    <SOAP-ENV:Body>
        <ns1:ivrEvents activityId="101" messageId="12345" source="IVR"
version="1.0">
            <logOnEvent audienceMemberId="34567"
timestamp="2005-11-07T12:27:33"/>
            <logOffEvent audienceMemberId="34568"
timestamp="2005-11-07T12:27:33" smokeStatus="Smoked"
callInitiator="IVR"/>
            <logOffEvent audienceMemberId="34569"
timestamp="2005-11-07T12:27:33" smokeStatus="SmokeFree"
callInitiator="IVR"/>
        </ns1:ivrEvents>
    </SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

This is the format it chooses for objects sent to SoapServer handler
functions, it should support it for SoapClient function calls.

Actual result:
--------------
With the above code the current implementation properly creates the
logOnEvent subtag and stops there no logOffEvents are added.  If you
attempt to add multiple logOnEvents alone in an array they are not
properly added as multiple logOnEvents either.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


-- 
Edit this bug report at http://bugs.php.net/?id=35142&edit=1

Reply via email to