Bug #63976 [Asn]: Parent class incorrectly using child constant in class property

2013-03-19 Thread mike
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1

 ID: 63976
 Updated by: m...@php.net
 Reported by:don at smugmug dot com
 Summary:Parent class incorrectly using child constant in
 class property
 Status: Assigned
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Class/Object related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.4.10
 Assigned To:dmitry
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

Reflection is also affected.

...and I couldn't come up with code yet, where parent:: is problematic.


Previous Comments:

[2013-03-19 10:00:45] m...@php.net

Unfortunately, this also changes error messages to something like:

Undefined class constant 'Foo::B' instead of 'self::B'...


[2013-03-19 09:59:23] m...@php.net

The following patch has been added/updated:

Patch Name: zend_do_fetch_constant
Revision:   1363687163
URL:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=63976&patch=zend_do_fetch_constant&revision=1363687163


[2013-03-18 13:09:52] dmi...@php.net

I understood the problem and your patch, I also agree what it fixes the problem 
for this particular case.

Unfortunately, I afraid that it may break some applications, because it may 
make constant resolution early in the moment, when such constants were not 
defined yet. For example your patch is going to break the following script.



I think the problem may be solved by substituting "self" and "parent" by actual 
class names at compile-time. It must be quite easy to do it for "self" (in 
zend_do_fetch_constant or in zend_do_declare_property), but not so easy for 
"parent" (we may use CG(parent_class_name) to solve it).


[2013-03-14 17:42:39] don at smugmug dot com

I have validated that the patch solves our use case (and the test case in this 
bug).  Thanks Mike!


[2013-03-14 09:01:59] m...@php.net

@dmitry, can you have a look at the , please? 

The condition could actually be simplified to

 if (ce->type == ZEND_USER_CLASS) ...

Thank you.




The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976


-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1


Bug #63976 [Asn]: Parent class incorrectly using child constant in class property

2013-03-19 Thread mike
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1

 ID: 63976
 Updated by: m...@php.net
 Reported by:don at smugmug dot com
 Summary:Parent class incorrectly using child constant in
 class property
 Status: Assigned
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Class/Object related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.4.10
 Assigned To:dmitry
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

Unfortunately, this also changes error messages to something like:

Undefined class constant 'Foo::B' instead of 'self::B'...


Previous Comments:

[2013-03-19 09:59:23] m...@php.net

The following patch has been added/updated:

Patch Name: zend_do_fetch_constant
Revision:   1363687163
URL:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=63976&patch=zend_do_fetch_constant&revision=1363687163


[2013-03-18 13:09:52] dmi...@php.net

I understood the problem and your patch, I also agree what it fixes the problem 
for this particular case.

Unfortunately, I afraid that it may break some applications, because it may 
make constant resolution early in the moment, when such constants were not 
defined yet. For example your patch is going to break the following script.



I think the problem may be solved by substituting "self" and "parent" by actual 
class names at compile-time. It must be quite easy to do it for "self" (in 
zend_do_fetch_constant or in zend_do_declare_property), but not so easy for 
"parent" (we may use CG(parent_class_name) to solve it).


[2013-03-14 17:42:39] don at smugmug dot com

I have validated that the patch solves our use case (and the test case in this 
bug).  Thanks Mike!


[2013-03-14 09:01:59] m...@php.net

@dmitry, can you have a look at the , please? 

The condition could actually be simplified to

 if (ce->type == ZEND_USER_CLASS) ...

Thank you.


[2013-02-14 17:30:36] m...@php.net

The following patch has been added/updated:

Patch Name: update_class_constants
Revision:   1360863036
URL:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=63976&patch=update_class_constants&revision=1360863036




The remainder of the comments for this report are too long. To view
the rest of the comments, please view the bug report online at

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976


-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1


Bug #63976 [Asn]: Parent class incorrectly using child constant in class property

2013-03-18 Thread dmitry
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1

 ID: 63976
 Updated by: dmi...@php.net
 Reported by:don at smugmug dot com
 Summary:Parent class incorrectly using child constant in
 class property
 Status: Assigned
 Type:   Bug
 Package:Class/Object related
 Operating System:   Ubuntu 12.04
 PHP Version:5.4.10
 Assigned To:dmitry
 Block user comment: N
 Private report: N

 New Comment:

I understood the problem and your patch, I also agree what it fixes the problem 
for this particular case.

Unfortunately, I afraid that it may break some applications, because it may 
make constant resolution early in the moment, when such constants were not 
defined yet. For example your patch is going to break the following script.



I think the problem may be solved by substituting "self" and "parent" by actual 
class names at compile-time. It must be quite easy to do it for "self" (in 
zend_do_fetch_constant or in zend_do_declare_property), but not so easy for 
"parent" (we may use CG(parent_class_name) to solve it).


Previous Comments:

[2013-03-14 17:42:39] don at smugmug dot com

I have validated that the patch solves our use case (and the test case in this 
bug).  Thanks Mike!


[2013-03-14 09:01:59] m...@php.net

@dmitry, can you have a look at the , please? 

The condition could actually be simplified to

 if (ce->type == ZEND_USER_CLASS) ...

Thank you.


[2013-02-14 17:30:36] m...@php.net

The following patch has been added/updated:

Patch Name: update_class_constants
Revision:   1360863036
URL:
https://bugs.php.net/patch-display.php?bug=63976&patch=update_class_constants&revision=1360863036


[2013-01-12 03:53:33] don at smugmug dot com

'Have a preference' should have said 'I have a preference'.  Certainly not 
intending for PHP to add some new INI option or something to change how 
static:: 
and self:: behave. :)

Also, have confirmed this on 5.4.4 and CentOS in addition to Ubuntu and 5.4.10, 
both with and without extensions like APC loaded.


[2013-01-12 03:51:21] don at smugmug dot com

Description:

Class properties that rely on potentially inherited class constants have 
unpredictable behavior.

Since PHP doesn't support Child class properties referencing static values like 
static::CONST, the meaning of self::CONST is ambiguous. One of two things 
should 
happen:

1. It should use the value defined in the actual class in question (like self:: 
is used throughout the rest of PHP).

2. It should treat self:: in this case, since it's compile-time and not late 
static binding, like static:: and walk the inheritance tree, delivering the 
result for the Child class.

Option #1 seems the most sane, but PHP often behaves like it intends #2 to 
work. 
But not always...

In the provided examples, 'brokenA.php' behaves like #1, above, while 
'brokenB.php' and 'brokenC.php' behave like #2. The only thing that's changed 
is 
the order in which the classes are require()'d.

In a complex script, with autoloaders, class instantiation order isn't 
predictable, of course, resulting in unpredictable results.

Test script:
---
Example code: https://github.com/onethumb/php-parent-child-constant-bug

Expected result:

Consistent results for Baz->table.  Either 'foo' or 'baz' 100% of the time, 
rather 
than mixed up depending on require() order.

Have a preference for adding static::CONST to PHP and making self::CONST behave 
like self:: does in the rest of the language (resulting in Baz->table == 'baz' 
in 
the examples if we used static::CONST), but if that's not preferable for some 
reason, self::CONST should probably behave like self:: everywhere else 
(resulting 
in Baz->table == 'foo' in the examples).

Actual result:
--
brokenA.php:
Bar Object
(
[table] => bar
)
Baz Object
(
[table] => foo
)

brokenB.php:
Bar Object
(
[table] => bar
)
Baz Object
(
[table] => baz
)

brokenC.php:
Baz Object
(
[table] => baz
)
Bar Object
(
[table] => bar
)
Baz Object
(
[table] => baz
)






-- 
Edit this bug report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63976&edit=1