Re: [PHP-DEV] Fix for bug 19207 (change of cgi behaviour in PHP4.3.0)

2002-11-22 Thread Jani Taskinen 
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:

>On Friday 22 November 2002 04:18, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>> I can't remember that discussion..but why do we need
>> yet another ini option? If the current behaviour is incorrect,
>> and you can fix it..why do you even ask here? :)
>
>FYI:
>http://www.phpbuilder.com/mail/php-developer-list/2002092/0238.php
>http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=19207
>
>Edin
>
>P.S. I don't like adding ini setting either, but I see no other way of solving 
>the issue.


Ah, I see..well, as long as the current behaviour stays as
the default one, feel free to commit your changes. :)

--Jani



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] Fix for bug 19207 (change of cgi behaviour in PHP4.3.0)

2002-11-21 Thread Jani Taskinen 
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Edin Kadribasic wrote:

>Attached is a patch that fixes bug #19207 in accordance with previous 
>discussion on php-dev. It add cgi.rfc2616_headers ini option which is by 
>default set to off and mimics current 4.3.0 behaviour. If its set to on the 
>HTTP status line is sent in accordance to RFC2616 which was default  for PHP 
>4.2.3 and earlier.
>
>Any objections to commiting this fix?

I can't remember that discussion..but why do we need 
yet another ini option? If the current behaviour is incorrect,
and you can fix it..why do you even ask here? :)

--Jani



-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php