Re: [PHP-DEV] le_ why static?

2001-01-26 Thread Sascha Schumann

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Sam Liddicott wrote:

> Why are le_* garbage destructor handles declared static?
>
> As far as I can tell this means other c files in the same module can't
> "extern" it but as it is static in file scope it has none of the other
> benefits of being static?
>
> Is it to do with threading?  What?

Usually, other source files do not need access to those
symbols.  Hence, exporting them without a reason would only
pollute the global symbol space.  If you need to access such
a symbol in more than one source file, I suggest prefixing
the symbol correctly.

- Sascha


-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP-DEV] le_ why static?

2001-01-26 Thread Andrei Zmievski

On Fri, 26 Jan 2001, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Why are le_* garbage destructor handles declared static?
> 
> As far as I can tell this means other c files in the same module can't
> "extern" it but as it is static in file scope it has none of the other
> benefits of being static?
> 
> Is it to do with threading?  What?

It doesn't have to be static. I've used non-static le_* variables in the
latest extension I'm writing.

-Andrei
* Gun manufacturers don't make bad products, bad parents do. *

-- 
PHP Development Mailing List 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]