Re: [PHP] Code Bulk
Actually, the file in question is 3000 lines long, 99% in functions.
Im trying to tell him that he may not see any speed ups in code execution.
As long as I know Im right, its just the peace of mind when I go to bed
tonight :)
Martin Towell wrote:
> any speed difference will be miniscule/negligible - is speed, to the
> microsecond, important in this situation?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gerard Samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:23 AM
> To: PHP
> Subject: [PHP] Code Bulk
>
>
> Im in a debate with someone else.
> Basically were debating code bulk.
>
> This is just an example ->
>
> if (isset($run_this_code)) {
> echo $this->run_this_code;
> }
> echo 'Finished';
> ?>
>
> Now, if I understand php correctly, the whole script gets parsed, but
> since $run_this code isn't set, $this->run_this_code doesn't get
> echoed/executed. What this other person is telling me that its more
> effiecient for *him* to have ->
>
> echo 'Finished';
> ?>
>
> instead.
>
> The script is a general purpose script. Its not built for one person.
> Some may use $run_this_code and some may not. So in taking out that bit
> of code, all it does is save the parser, what fraction of a fraction of
> a second??
> Im just looking for ammunition so I could go and shoot this guy down... :)
>
> Thanks for listening
>
>
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Code Bulk
any speed difference will be miniscule/negligible - is speed, to the microsecond, important in this situation? -Original Message- From: Gerard Samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:23 AM To: PHP Subject: [PHP] Code Bulk Im in a debate with someone else. Basically were debating code bulk. This is just an example -> run_this_code; } echo 'Finished'; ?> Now, if I understand php correctly, the whole script gets parsed, but since $run_this code isn't set, $this->run_this_code doesn't get echoed/executed. What this other person is telling me that its more effiecient for *him* to have -> instead. The script is a general purpose script. Its not built for one person. Some may use $run_this_code and some may not. So in taking out that bit of code, all it does is save the parser, what fraction of a fraction of a second?? Im just looking for ammunition so I could go and shoot this guy down... :) Thanks for listening -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Code Bulk
Im in a debate with someone else. Basically were debating code bulk. This is just an example -> run_this_code; } echo 'Finished'; ?> Now, if I understand php correctly, the whole script gets parsed, but since $run_this code isn't set, $this->run_this_code doesn't get echoed/executed. What this other person is telling me that its more effiecient for *him* to have -> instead. The script is a general purpose script. Its not built for one person. Some may use $run_this_code and some may not. So in taking out that bit of code, all it does is save the parser, what fraction of a fraction of a second?? Im just looking for ammunition so I could go and shoot this guy down... :) Thanks for listening -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
