Re: [PHP] Doctrine vs. Propel
Thank you all for your kind replies.
Re: [PHP] Doctrine vs. Propel
On Feb 4, 2008 1:44 PM, AmirBehzad Eslami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I've just heard of ORM (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks written for PHP. It seems that there are two major frameworks here: Doctrine and Propel: http://www.phpdoctrine.org/ http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/ I wonder which one is better? What is the difference between these? I'm talking about the learning curve, peroformance. What are the advantages/disadvantages of each one? hmm... i havent seen this doctrine yet; it looks pretty cool. actually, they seem to be somewhat similar. some things ive noticed are doctrine uses yaml in its schema files, and doctrine appears to have a caching mechanism already for both queries and results. thats nice, because for propel youll have to roll your own. unless perhaps symphony has done this already ? also, propel doesnt have anything like DQL. i have to say, doctrine has some killer docs as well. these appear to be more robust than what propel has at a cursory glance. ill probly take a closer look at this as time permits; thanks for the info! -nathan
[PHP] Doctrine vs. Propel
Dear List, I've just heard of ORM (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks written for PHP. It seems that there are two major frameworks here: Doctrine and Propel: http://www.phpdoctrine.org/ http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/ I wonder which one is better? What is the difference between these? I'm talking about the learning curve, peroformance. What are the advantages/disadvantages of each one? Thank you in advance, Behzad
Re: [PHP] Doctrine vs. Propel
2008. 02. 4, hétfő keltezéssel 22.14-kor AmirBehzad Eslami ezt írta: Dear List, I've just heard of ORM (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks written for PHP. It seems that there are two major frameworks here: Doctrine and Propel: http://www.phpdoctrine.org/ http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/ I wonder which one is better? What is the difference between these? doctrine has several very cool and useful features which propel does not have. for example real inheritance. and their documentation is also much superior. however doctrine is still in early stage of development, so if you work on a project where stability is an issue I suggest using propel (later, when doctrine becomes stable, we plan to change to it). if you just want to experiment with these, try both. :) greets Zoltán Németh I'm talking about the learning curve, peroformance. What are the advantages/disadvantages of each one? Thank you in advance, Behzad -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Doctrine vs. Propel
2008. 02. 4, hétfő keltezéssel 14.03-kor Nathan Nobbe ezt írta: On Feb 4, 2008 1:44 PM, AmirBehzad Eslami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear List, I've just heard of ORM (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks written for PHP. It seems that there are two major frameworks here: Doctrine and Propel: http://www.phpdoctrine.org/ http://propel.phpdb.org/trac/ I wonder which one is better? What is the difference between these? I'm talking about the learning curve, peroformance. What are the advantages/disadvantages of each one? hmm... i havent seen this doctrine yet; it looks pretty cool. actually, they seem to be somewhat similar. some things ive noticed are doctrine uses yaml in its schema files, and doctrine appears to have a caching mechanism already for both queries and results. thats nice, because for propel youll have to roll your own. unless perhaps symphony has done this already ? symfony AFAIK only has file caching on its own greets Zoltán Németh also, propel doesnt have anything like DQL. i have to say, doctrine has some killer docs as well. these appear to be more robust than what propel has at a cursory glance. ill probly take a closer look at this as time permits; thanks for the info! -nathan -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
